ENTROPY (141) - Terra Bella, California, USA - DEC 24, 2002
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
umm...this beer isnt good or bad it seemed to snoop on the down side of the two, then again I dont care, I have the number one beer in stock hidden and gaining power. yea man.
aobecksy (700) - Middle of no where, Ohio, USA - DEC 24, 2002
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
deep honey color with malty aroma--wait I read that someone where before. Very light with dry finish.
DrunkAsASkunk (847) - Lynnwood, Washington, USA - DEC 21, 2002
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
I saw the bottle and i was like "Gee, this is gonna be the good..i mean look at the label, its got a skeleton on it"...then all went to hell. The aroma was that of pure malt..maybe some yeastiness, but the aroma was very weak and hard to distinguish. The Dead Guy Ale poured a very medium to darkish orange, but was very bright orange with mininal carbonation and practically no head in the light (the head lasted about 10 seconds, and that was with effort may i add). The taste was just a battering of malt on the tongue followed by one of the most god-awful hop bitternesses i have ever had to deal with. It ended very dry and unclean in my opinion..i like the carbonation aspect, but the maltiness is overboard, and the spicey/bitter finish is just terrible...it makes me cringe in horror..it almost has a grapefruity aspect to it. To say the least i wont be going near this again.....this has almost as much malt as a malt liquor for cryin out loud!!!
NJBeerman013 (1032) - Hamilton Twp., New Jersey, USA - DEC 20, 2002
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Not bad. This is not exactly my favorite style, however, I do enjoy a change of pace. It was more like a sweet ale then a true bock. A little hop mixed with a heafty malt sweetness. Well balanced.
khayman70 (154) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - DEC 19, 2002
4.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
I love Rogue’s version of this Maibock. It was crisp and clean with very nice color. Quite malty to the nose and the slightly dry finish was pleasant.
BückDich (5467) - McCall, Idaho, USA - DEC 17, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Very malty smell and taste. Bitter and full of hops. An appreciative amber with a kick ass bottle. Should be in everyone’s rating list.
MrRomero (1966) - Nolanville, Texas, USA - DEC 15, 2002
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Another fine Rogue product from a recovering Rogue hater. Malty flavor with light hops. Very good.
herbjones (742) - Orange, California, USA - DEC 11, 2002
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Nice floral hop nose with a bit of malty goodness.Good balance to the flavor with a little bitterness near the end. Decent session brew.
Crit (3075) - New Westminster, British Columbia, CANADA - DEC 11, 2002
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Amber with lasting off white head. Small bead. Good hop/dry malt nose.Carmel malt flavor.Faint lingering hop finish
Slick (1971) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - DEC 8, 2002
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Nice color the aroma seemed kind of lightly malty nice hops in the taste a a slighlty bitter finish hmmm might have been the beer before might have to rerate at a later date again to be fair