changxao (104) - South Carolina, USA - DEC 5, 2004
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Pours a golden-amber color with a nice fluffy head, leaves nice lacing. Aroma is ripe with malt and hops, flavor is the same. Has a full body witha bitter yet balanced finish. Overall an exellent brew that is good with dinner or desert.
jimmack (1223) - Nutley, New Jersey, USA - DEC 4, 2004
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Copper color with a small off white head. Sweet aroma of malt, caramel and hops. Flavor is on the sweet side,
with caramel and a good dose of hops.
A little thin. Probably my least favorite Rogue beer.
IMtheOptimator (1164) - Bethel, Connecticut, USA - DEC 3, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Poured a clear copperish-amber with a small white head that dissipated completely. Light vinuous aroma. Taste seems to have some grape and slight spice character. However, it has a strong watered-down impression, not unlike most macros surprisingly. Drinkable, but very disappointing considering who brewed it.
GoldenSpunky (120) - Rochester, New York, USA - DEC 3, 2004
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This Ale is decent but not what I had expected. I heard that this beer was very flavorful and bitter, but it is very mediocore tasting with little zest. Slightly carbonated with a slightly malty taste and little flavor. I think this beer would be better from the cask but im not sure. Do like the name of the beer though.
WeissGuy (10) - Eugene, Oregon, USA - DEC 1, 2004
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
it smells like really sweet bread, and it just tastes so darn good, so malty and the lassy head lasts for ever
brentfeesh (1208) - Mansfield, Ohio, USA - NOV 29, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
I wrote down my impressions of this beer than lost it, so the above ranking is my most generous recollection of scores. I just donít care for this. I can clearly recognize that it is a distinct, quality beer, but I just canít take it. There is something smoky (i.e. smoked salmon) about it that sticks with me unbearably. Iíve tried this several times over the years and itís just not for me.
meathookjones (245) - Sterling, Virginia, USA - NOV 28, 2004
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Had this on tap at Dr. Dremoís. Dead Guy came out a dark amber color with not much head to it, probably due to the bartender more than the beer. The aroma has a pleasant hoppy citrus smell with creamy malt and fruity smell to go along. Taste starts off with a bitter hoppiness with spiciness to it. A nice creamy malt flavor on the back to provide some balance. It has a nice mouthfeel and is very drinkable. Has enough complexity to keep you coming back and it would make for a good session beer
SilkTork (5432) - Southampton, United Kingdom, Hampshire, ENGLAND - NOV 26, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: NOV 28, 2004 May, 2003: 12 oz bottle from Bottles, London. I can see why they call it a bock, but I thought it was an American Pale Ale until I came here to rate it. Sticky sweet with a healthy dose of bitter hops. This is obviously the most popular Rogue - 305 ratings. Very smooth and clean. Despite the sweet malt and bitter hops this has little in the way of character or finesse, apart from a sort of plastic barbeque quality. Itís like a clumsy homebrew. [2.1]
Nov, 2004: BBE Jan, 2004. Real ugly when not drunk at fridge temperature. Hops are stale, but this is an old bottle. A strong pale beer with a lot of oily hops. Best drunk cold to keep alcohol flavours reduced. Not to my taste. [2.2]
achtungpv (239) - Austin, Texas, USA - NOV 25, 2004
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
This was a lot hoppier than I was expecting. Once I got over that shock it was nice and smooth. Took a few drinks to get used to it. Starts dry and finishes even drier.
xray (50) - Bloomfield, New Jersey, USA - NOV 20, 2004
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottled. hard to beleive Rogue would market this as a Maibock. Not malty enough and way hoppier than any Maibock Iíve ever had. At first I didnít like it at all, but it grew on me as I continued to drink it.