daboskabouter (1470) - Fergus, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 14, 2002
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Citrusy, oily, big hoppy finish, good, but I donít remember anything to set this apart from other American barleywines.
Wakie (612) - Centreville, Virginia, USA - AUG 1, 2002
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Ho-hum. Standard Rogue beer. Very strong, tons of malt, and dark. Had this alongside a Rogue Maierbock and I have to say that there is little difference. Nice amber color though.
Vac (2445) - San Diego, California, USA - JUL 31, 2002
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 12/20
Deep Reddish-brown color iwth little head. Sweet whiskeyish aroma with a hint of chocolate. Rich Flavor, similar to whiskey at first then sweet and chocolatey with a dry hoppy finish.
DrBeer (829) - Solna Stockholm, SWEDEN - JUL 29, 2002
4.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Iīm overwhelmed by this three year old bottle and have to surrender to the greatness of it.
Itīs orange-brown with no head. It has a massive amount of sediment in the bottle(dumped in another glass and later added to the beer).
The aroma is huge with licorice, bitter chocolate, port-tones and almonds. The alcohol is imminent and with the yeast dumped in it gets fruitier but also the aroma is numbed.
The flavor is exploding with licorice, almonds, fine bitter chocolate, coffee, toffee and hints of wormwood at the end.
Itīs extremely heavy on the palate and the bitterness comes roaring in at the end like the space shuttle on steroids. What do you expect of 120 B.U. ?
The flavor and alcohol is actually numbing to the mouth. With yeast it gets fruitier and even smoother. A truly great beer.
drismyhero (815) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - JUL 27, 2002
3.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
I am tentative to really give Old Crustacean an in depth rating as I have not had too much experience with barley wines, but I did enjoy this (over the past hour and a half Iíve been sipping it). Iíd think the malt alone would put this beer on the map, but there is a very powerful bitterness that seems to kind of shock the senses right along with the alchohol flavor. Pretty complex when you work your way through the first wave of bitterness: some espresso, toasted, tamari.
Oakes (11031) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUL 23, 2002
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
ReRate: a three year old vintage is drinkable - chewy, piney, slight band-aid, very richly hops, bitter chocolate, earthy malt. Maybe will continue to improve but has too far to go for me.
Original: Well, Iíve finally found a beer that is overhopped. Itís just bitter, with no other sensation. Aroma is acceptible, but the muddy appearance and unbalanced flavour is not desirable. If you want a hoppy barley wine, grab a Big Foot, Horizontal or Behemoth.
TAR (2393) - Lafayette, Colorado, USA - JUL 20, 2002
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
(2001, 12 oz.) Aroma is comprised of what reminds me of a hybrid English-American Barleywine. Mushy, fruity, jammy, chocolatey malts meld with piney, tropical, and earthy hops. Also slightly airy, phenolic, and musty notes. Eye-burning hop vapors. Creamy, tan foam which abates into a non-sticky ring. Muddy maroon without the clumpy yeast pour. Brash, dry, hot-spicy bitterness grabs ahold before malts get a chance to strut their stuff. Raw hop-leaf bitterness lingers for, what seems like, an eternity. Just enough malt structure to justify this as a Barleywine. Yeast pour adds...nothing. These dag-gone hops would cut through poop if they were given the chance. Comparable to swallowing cough syrup, in a good way. Burning flares down the gullet last a few minutes. This is way intense. Flavors do not approach complexity, but with an over-the-top Willamette-Golding astringency, like this, it doesnít have to be. Nothing will satisfy your hop craving if this does not. Although I really know nothing about cigars, I believe this Vintage would pair extremely well with one to cool things down. I expect this to turn into nectar with a few years of age behind it. This is the true, undispisputed Alpha King of the world. My only beef is: Why isnít this available in six-packs? For those of us who want to age and contrast the previous vintage. A case of this stuff would do me well. Warning: this may cause nausea. You may need a friend, or enemy, to help you put this thing down.. I nearly did. This is way too young, but who cares?
Murphy (1759) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - JUL 20, 2002
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
UPDATED: FEB 8, 2004 Didn't really like this one. Taste was somewhat harsh, and didn't sit well in the mouth. Alcohol goes straight to the dome. ReRate: 1998 bottle, consumed Feb 2004. Great red color. Excellent barleywine aroma. Really smooth, very drinkable.
jskendzel (602) - Washington DC, USA - JUL 18, 2002
3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Citrusy, alcohol notes evident immediately. Dark red in color and presents with a thick, rich head. Chinook, possibly Cascades in this brew. To be honest, i had this one before, during, and after dinner because it was SOO strong! A little too much alcohol to be really enjoyable and at times overwhelming with the hops. Calm it down and it will be much more enjoyable.
Northernbrewer (147) - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA - JUL 13, 2002
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Letís face it hopheads, some beer really can be too bitter and this is one of them. Copared to a well hopped barleywine like Bigfoot this one misses the point. Part of it is that there is also some bitterness from the malt and the brewers seem to have failed to take that into account. Any beer with this much malt will probably taste good in time, it just may take more years that Iím willing to give it.