kp (10884) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - SEP 1, 2007
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Name: Cran-n-Cherry Ale
deep red color, malt cran cherry aroma, malt and cranberry flavor with subtle cherry undertone, smooth finish
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 5/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 10/20
Name: Rogue ’n Berry
Source: Taco Mac, Sandy Springs
dark red-purple-amber, thin frothy head, nice lace, slight sweet berry aroma, light berry flavor, low bitterness, smooth finish
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 8/10; Flavor: 6/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 13/20
The score was calculated based upon the notes and an old scoring system.
DocLock (9982) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 7, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Cellared. DEcent berry aroma, with a decent head. Tastes of berries, hops, and malt. Finishes sweet, with berries and some hops at the finish. I will miss this beer.
Crit (3817) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - NOV 20, 2003
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
Highly carebonatd, gassy and fizzy. Rather subdued fruit taste, with a slight tartness. Not one of their better efforts.
TAR (2671) - Marshall (Asheville area), North Carolina, USA - AUG 10, 2001
3.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pretty typical, not of Rogue though. I thought they could have done a lot better. Not much complxities to this cherry colored brew. Brewerd with marion berries I believe.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - MAR 27, 2001
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Still not into ’Fruit’ beers, while drinkable, the carbination and overly sweet tones, detract from the barley malts and what little hops are present.
joet (2537) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - JUN 10, 2001
2.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Two words: Drink lambics.
Racegoer (354) - Indiana, Indiana, USA - NOV 8, 2002
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Well they missed it here ,this is a good brewery, I just think they ought to focus on less beers and More quality, like 3 Floyds or Dogfish, not much here try again, another flavour maybe, fruity & sweet, not recommended by me.
dins (266) - Texas, USA - MAR 28, 2002
2.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I’d rather have a lambic. Slightly sweet with odd dryness in finish. Not an alco-pop but not quite a beer either. Little flavor outside of the fruit.
adwoan99 (244) - Ft. Worth, Texas, USA - JUN 23, 2003
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
This beer is pretty nice, smooth. Fairly sweet start and finish - nearly no bitterness at all. Small head fully diminishes, leaving a few minute lacings. This beer is pretty flavourful, but I was expecting a little stronger berry flavour. 'Tis a nice beer for after-dinner relaxation, or perhaps with some dessert, but forget about having it at a barbecue.
vector (163) - Dallas, Texas, USA - MAY 20, 2003
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: AUG 29, 2003 One of the better fruit beers I've had. Not too sweet, slightly sour, with a hint of berry flavor. Brew was obviously unfiltered as it was cloudy and had large sediment at the bottom of the bottle. I liked it better than the lambics I've tried. Some malt and hop present but not very pronounced. Overall, it smelled better than it tasted but it was certainly drinkable.