jennythenipper (74) - St. Paul, Minnesota, USA - APR 3, 2002
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not the worst beer Iíve ever had. I like the bottle, it got an extra point for the bottle. A weird thing happened in England about 10 years ago, this beer became the in thing to drink in expensive, hard-to-get -into North london clubs. Weird. Why, why why would people living in London drink this? They were paying about 8 dollars a bottle! Anyway, itís ok if the only other thing on offer is a Miller or AB product.
grymy (105) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - APR 3, 2002
4.5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 19/20
Great beer with the most unique bottle ive seen.....all i can say is..
from the glass lined tanks of old latrobe, we tender you this premium beer for your enjoymant, as a tribute to your good taste. it comes from the mountain springs to you í33í
NattyLight (7) - USA - MAR 29, 2002 does not count
4.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
This beer smells like ass. The only reason iím drinking is for itís high ABV. It tight though, peace
zborgerd (187) - Illinois, USA - MAR 25, 2002
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: MAR 27, 2004 I have to give this props for what it costs. You can't beat it for $4 per/6 pack. It is certainly better than the likes of what you get from AB. My complaints are in it's lightness, strong carbonation, and cream corn taste, but all of that is OK when you are broke and can't afford to pay twice as much on a good pack of beer. Good and cheap fallback to my normal Sierra Nevada (my staple drink).
DrunkCaleb (69) - Michigan, USA - MAR 23, 2002
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Green bottle equals skunk. Not good. Besides Heineken, itís the only beer I couldnít finish. Nasty.
olympian (107) - USA - MAR 23, 2002
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
The first time I tasted RR was in bottles. I thought: íPee-peeí. Later, I had it on draft. I thought: íDRAFT pee-peeí.
Iím deadly serious. Lemonade is much better (if itís decent lemonade).
Odin (123) - Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA - MAR 22, 2002
1.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I donít know what youíd call this stuff, but it sure as hell isnít beer.
alienwewee99 (6) - USA - MAR 21, 2002 does not count
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
It was a real good beer!!! nice and light but refreshing. what does the í33í mean? well anyway it is some good stuff
later4you (23) - Wyoming, USA - MAR 20, 2002
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
aracauna (3511) - Georgia, USA - MAR 20, 2002
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: OCT 13, 2008 Not a bad beer. It’s definitely got a very light flavor. There aren’t any real citrus hints but has the same kind of feel and is pretty refreshing when cold like a light citrus soda. This isn’t supposed to be a heavy, malty dark ale. It’s not supposed to be. For what it’s supposed to be, it’s not bad.