malkyore (213) - - JUL 14, 2014
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
So normally I like beers for their flavor... Or their character... Or whatever.. But this beer, while bad, is so horrifying honest I had it give it a slightly higher rating than it deserved just cuz it admitted to having both rice and corn... Good for you rolling rock, you know what you are and your like SCREW YOU CRAFT BEER THIS IS BEER. Its not good, but I respect it nonetheless.
AAEA (146) - California, USA - JUL 5, 2014
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
25 FL OZ ($1.69) was okay beer. nothing very special but its not the worst Iíve had.
vilsack1987 (22) - - JUN 29, 2014
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pretty good beer to drink if you are planing on pounding about 15 beers. Only good if you plan on blacking out
kmlen87 (22) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 27, 2014
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Good pale beer, different taste then most lagers. Interesting aroma and pour. Go Pittsburgh.
MikeLovesBeer1 (1) - New Hampshire, USA - JUN 25, 2014 does not count
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pours a bright yellow in color. Smell is of Corn. Little to no head. Some Light Lacing on the small head. Has lots of carbonation that lasts until the last sip. Very low alcohol light beer. This beer is good for chugging on a hot summer day!
TheHopster (833) - Netcong, New Jersey, USA - JUN 24, 2014
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
(bottle) Itís been a while since Iíve had this but I grabbed one at a backyard summer party. Fine if ice cold in hot weather for playing horseshoes or bag toss. Watery, with a note of skunk and sightly tart flavor. Preferable to Bud.
ariesluv1 (3) - Siler City, North Carolina, USA - JUN 21, 2014 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Like a cheaper heniken that i never knew tasted so damn good def a suprising beer
Bulk_Carrier (2264) - Juneau, Alaska, USA - JUN 13, 2014
1.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Well, I grew up in PA and remember when my Dad raved about how great this used to be before Latrobe sold out. Funny, how Iím only getting to this now, sigh, ah, oh well.
Anyways, hereís my notes.
Its been poured in pint glasses and pilseners.
The appearance was a super light yellow color with a rapidly dissipating one finger white foamy head that left barely any lacing.
The smell has always been super skunky and bland.
The taste was exactly the same.
The palate, well, if anything, its exceptionally light, ,and ya know how sessionable this one can be.
Overall, this is one of those definitions of Light Lagers taken over by InBev.
I wish I had it when my Dad had it and what this originally was meant to be. Good job InBev for screwing this up.
Padchenko (92) - Dublin, IRELAND - JUN 2, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pale golden lager. Nothing distinct - in fact there isnít much taste at all. Not the worst lager out there but thatís as much as can be said for it
markas101 (1898) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - MAY 31, 2014
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Tap, Earl of Sussex, Ottawa, Canada. Very pale, no head. Very faint aroma. Equally faint flavour. Nothing offensive, though little to speak to.