jcnielsen (1638) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - SEP 13, 2013
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Can at Bodegas in Lincoln. Pours a pale yellow color with white head. Corn, grain aromas and flavors.
cwald (91) - Oregon, USA - SEP 13, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. HGT Brew club tasting night. This beer tasted better than it looks. Light, crisp. Decent for larger. Not to skunky.
frankliemydear (11) - Roseville, California, USA - SEP 12, 2013
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Lots of negative comments about Rolling Rock. I will say it’s better out of a bottle than from a can. I thought this beer was perfectly good. It’s a light beer. A little bit sweet. I think it’s an average, run of the mill beer which means it’s fine. I liked it. But I like Miller High Life and Pabst, too. I like dark beers the best, but for a light beer, this is good.
ChayChimay (1) - - SEP 6, 2013 does not count
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Rolling Rock us to be a decent nice crisp beer until it sold to Anheuser-Busch, I think back in 2006 — for millions they got the recipe for RR mountain-brewed extra-pale lager and the Old Latrobe brewing company. But the beer isnt made in the glass lined tanks anymore or from the mountain springs of Old Latrobe, instead it comes from the swamps of Jersey, and taste nothing like it used to. (hence the sour after taste) Years ago when I started recognizing it tasting awful, I googled “rolling rock taste different” and stumbled on the news that it was no longer the same beer. Have not purchased another. They still keep the painted logo on the bottle which is what drew me into buying when I first began drinking it
artmcd8 (1216) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 1, 2013
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Very pale yellow color. Slight skunk aroma along with cereal. The taste was sweet like creamed corn and it had a diet soda fake sugar aftertaste. Not the most enjoyable.
Sheffee (27) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - AUG 22, 2013
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Reminded me of a light kolsch. Not bad for something done on an industrial scale. Good for summer get togethers. Better out of the can.
Christpuncher (641) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - AUG 22, 2013
2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Much better in the can than the bottle. A smooth extra pale ale with a bitter finish. Pours pretty clear an has little aftertaste.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
jimski (49) - - AUG 21, 2013
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Unfortunately, a pale lager that has not stood up well over time. Better than Budweiser or Miller but nothing that I would really want to spend my money on.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
I just had a couple of pints of Guinness-excellent
Geokkjer (5221) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - AUG 18, 2013
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can. Puts clear paddle yellow with a white head. Aroma of green and yellow apples, some herbal notes and fruitiness. Flavor is sweet malt and some fruitiness. Thin body, lively carbonation.
Meilby (6235) - Kristiansand, NORWAY - AUG 18, 2013
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Can 710ml @ Hotel Room, Hotel Aspen InnSuites, Flagstaff, AZ
Pours clear pale yellow with a white head. Aroma has notes of malt, grain, pear and apples. Taste is light sweet and light bitter. Body is light, texture is thin, carbonation is soft.