nicbristol99 (44) - Des Plaines, Illinois, USA - NOV 25, 2002
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not a bad beer as far as this type goes. Faint aroma, and a very mild taste. But itís extremely refreshing and has a halfway decent, smooth palate. The whole of this beer is somehow better than the sum of its parts. Definitely at the top of American microbrews, for what thatís worth.
AAEA (83) - California, USA - JUL 5, 2014
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
25 FL OZ ($1.69) was okay beer. nothing very special but its not the worst Iíve had.
vilsack1987 (20) - - JUN 29, 2014
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pretty good beer to drink if you are planing on pounding about 15 beers. Only good if you plan on blacking out
kmlen87 (23) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 27, 2014
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Good pale beer, different taste then most lagers. Interesting aroma and pour. Go Pittsburgh.
MikeLovesBeer1 (1) - New Hampshire, USA - JUN 25, 2014 does not count
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pours a bright yellow in color. Smell is of Corn. Little to no head. Some Light Lacing on the small head. Has lots of carbonation that lasts until the last sip. Very low alcohol light beer. This beer is good for chugging on a hot summer day!
TheHopster (784) - Netcong, New Jersey, USA - JUN 24, 2014
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
(bottle) Itís been a while since Iíve had this but I grabbed one at a backyard summer party. Fine if ice cold in hot weather for playing horseshoes or bag toss. Watery, with a note of skunk and sightly tart flavor. Preferable to Bud.
ariesluv1 (3) - Siler City, North Carolina, USA - JUN 21, 2014 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Like a cheaper heniken that i never knew tasted so damn good def a suprising beer
hockeybeerguy (1466) - Juneau, Alaska, USA - JUN 13, 2014
1.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Well, I grew up in PA and remember when my Dad raved about how great this used to be before Latrobe sold out. Funny, how Iím only getting to this now, sigh, ah, oh well.
Anyways, hereís my notes.
Its been poured in pint glasses and pilseners.
The appearance was a super light yellow color with a rapidly dissipating one finger white foamy head that left barely any lacing.
The smell has always been super skunky and bland.
The taste was exactly the same.
The palate, well, if anything, its exceptionally light, ,and ya know how sessionable this one can be.
Overall, this is one of those definitions of Light Lagers taken over by InBev.
I wish I had it when my Dad had it and what this originally was meant to be. Good job InBev for screwing this up.
Padchenko (66) - Dublin, IRELAND - JUN 2, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pale golden lager. Nothing distinct - in fact there isnít much taste at all. Not the worst lager out there but thatís as much as can be said for it
markas101 (1815) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - MAY 31, 2014
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Tap, Earl of Sussex, Ottawa, Canada. Very pale, no head. Very faint aroma. Equally faint flavour. Nothing offensive, though little to speak to.
lawman834 (214) - Georgia, USA - MAY 30, 2014
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Surprised to find that I hadnít rated this one yet. Had many of these back before I had discovered good beer. This used to be like a semi-premium upgrade from the cheap stuff...and honestly, it still kinda is. Got it on sale for Natty Light prices. It pours fizzy with a thin head that dissipated like that of a soda. Taste is watery and primarily consists of corn and cereal grain. Saving grace is that there are very faint grass and pepper notes. Itís a value at Keystone prices, but not impressive otherwise.