PorterPounder (3137), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Mar 4, 2004 Pleasantly surprised - Has a light golden, hazy appearance with a decent sized
head. Aroma has a sweet wort essence to it. Has a bit of a biscuity, sweet
taste to it with a bit of a licorice aftertaste. Very different from
regular RR - much less skunk. Goes down smooth. I think it is retired though - been replaced by the Low carb RR. Shag (1923), Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 | Mar 1, 2004 As if Rolling Rock wasn't light enough, this is pure water. Some grass notes in the flavor but basically water. Why do I bother with these light beers! I will pass from now on! hershiser2 (910), Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Feb 2, 2004 This beer is simply awful. Terrible all around: skunky smell and taste, nothing for appearance, mouthfeel (gag!!!), and very undrinkable. I'd rather drink nothing than have a Rolling Rock Light. Why, oh why, do people like this beer? Answer: people are sheep and buy into advertisement. Sham (1846), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jan 29, 2004 Pours a very light yellow, almost urine like in appearence. A foamy white head that leaves just a tad of lacing. Hello, aroma? Very light hops in the nose, barely detectable. Small malts in the flavor with a nibble of hops for the finish. Watery palate, thin body. Nothing impressive, but hey what can you expect? Turtboy (120), Lucasville, Ohio, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jan 12, 2004 Rolling rock is a light beer, why make a light version of a beer that already taste like water. These light beers need to be stopped. hopscotch (5475), Vero Beach, Florida, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Dec 23, 2003 Tastes more like Michelob Ultra than Michelob Ultra does! TheBeerGenius (153), Erie/Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Nov 9, 2003 The way I look at this beer is you love it or hate it. It has a strange distinguishable taste, kinda wheaty tasty. I actually have developed a taste for it and enjoy it. lbjohnson (6), Huntersville, North Carolina, USA does not count | 4.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 18/20 | Oct 11, 2003 Very good Beer to drink a lot and not fill full.
Clean, smooth and decent
aroma.
|