PorterPounder (3133), Tallahassee, Florida, USA Mar 4, 2004 Pleasantly surprised - Has a light golden, hazy appearance with a decent sized
head. Aroma has a sweet wort essence to it. Has a bit of a biscuity, sweet
taste to it with a bit of a licorice aftertaste. Very different from
regular RR - much less skunk. Goes down smooth. I think it is retired though - been replaced by the Low carb RR. Shag (1922), Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA Mar 1, 2004 As if Rolling Rock wasn't light enough, this is pure water. Some grass notes in the flavor but basically water. Why do I bother with these light beers! I will pass from now on! hershiser2 (903), Charlottesville, Virginia, USA Feb 2, 2004 This beer is simply awful. Terrible all around: skunky smell and taste, nothing for appearance, mouthfeel (gag!!!), and very undrinkable. I'd rather drink nothing than have a Rolling Rock Light. Why, oh why, do people like this beer? Answer: people are sheep and buy into advertisement. Sham (1846), Seattle, Washington, USA Jan 29, 2004 Pours a very light yellow, almost urine like in appearence. A foamy white head that leaves just a tad of lacing. Hello, aroma? Very light hops in the nose, barely detectable. Small malts in the flavor with a nibble of hops for the finish. Watery palate, thin body. Nothing impressive, but hey what can you expect? Turtboy (120), Lucasville, Ohio, USA Jan 12, 2004 Rolling rock is a light beer, why make a light version of a beer that already taste like water. These light beers need to be stopped. hopscotch (5441), Vero Beach, Florida, USA Dec 23, 2003 Tastes more like Michelob Ultra than Michelob Ultra does! TheBeerGenius (153), Erie/Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Nov 9, 2003 The way I look at this beer is you love it or hate it. It has a strange distinguishable taste, kinda wheaty tasty. I actually have developed a taste for it and enjoy it. lbjohnson (6), Huntersville, North Carolina, USA does not count Oct 11, 2003 Very good Beer to drink a lot and not fill full.
Clean, smooth and decent
aroma.
|