fly (1393) - austin, Tejas, Alabama, USA - MAY 26, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Say it .. "I love things in green bottles" - " I fall prey to add campaigns" - "I am a man of the people" .. there, now I feel better. At least I can claim to never have spent a cent on one of these, but they did take their toll on my time, liver and conscience. But I came out better and stronger, dammit.
DocLock (7421) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 12, 2004
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Not much aroma, color is very pale yellow. Tastes watery with very little hops. Not very good.
Aurelius (3844) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAR 4, 2004
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I'm pretty sure that the bottle I had had gone through protein drop. Bland malty arouma, surprisingly malty flavor with just a touch of that RR corn, and perhaps some licorice. Thin, lacked fizz. I was expecting some skunk but got none.
PorterPounder (5094) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAR 4, 2004
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pleasantly surprised - Has a light golden, hazy appearance with a decent sized
head. Aroma has a sweet wort essence to it. Has a bit of a biscuity, sweet
taste to it with a bit of a licorice aftertaste. Very different from
regular RR - much less skunk. Goes down smooth. I think it is retired though - been replaced by the Low carb RR.
Shag (2531) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - MAR 1, 2004
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
As if Rolling Rock wasn't light enough, this is pure water. Some grass notes in the flavor but basically water. Why do I bother with these light beers! I will pass from now on!
hershiser2 (1173) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - FEB 2, 2004
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This beer is simply awful. Terrible all around: skunky smell and taste, nothing for appearance, mouthfeel (gag!!!), and very undrinkable. I'd rather drink nothing than have a Rolling Rock Light. Why, oh why, do people like this beer? Answer: people are sheep and buy into advertisement.
Sham (1845) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JAN 29, 2004
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pours a very light yellow, almost urine like in appearence. A foamy white head that leaves just a tad of lacing. Hello, aroma? Very light hops in the nose, barely detectable. Small malts in the flavor with a nibble of hops for the finish. Watery palate, thin body. Nothing impressive, but hey what can you expect?
Turtboy (120) - Lucasville, Ohio, USA - JAN 12, 2004
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Rolling rock is a light beer, why make a light version of a beer that already taste like water. These light beers need to be stopped.
hopscotch (8458) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - DEC 23, 2003
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Tastes more like Michelob Ultra than Michelob Ultra does!
TheBeerGenius (154) - Pittsburgh, PA, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 9, 2003
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
The way I look at this beer is you love it or hate it. It has a strange distinguishable taste, kinda wheaty tasty. I actually have developed a taste for it and enjoy it.