kalisto9 (73), Crafton, Pennsylvania, USA
| 4.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 18/20 | Jan 18, 2003 So many seem to hate the Rock, but I"ve always really enjoyed its smooth, easy to drink nature. No, it doesn"t offer a taste challenge or bowl you over with great hops. It"s Rolling Rock in a lovely light version, dammit. And there will always be something worse, so it can"t be that bad. bebop99 (15), austin, Texas, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jan 1, 2003 seems more of a mom’s drink than anything else ProstmanSux (102), Lake Ariel, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Dec 23, 2002 not bad for a light beer.. jp311stud (9), St. Bonaventure, New York, USA does not count | 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Dec 22, 2002 there was no reason for this beer to be made. it is very watered down and doesn’t come close to tasting like a beer. mkrill99 (28), USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Dec 4, 2002 Not bad for a light beer, ok by me Supaflyfresh99 (98), E.Williston, New York, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Nov 30, 2002 rolling rock blows. Braudog (3757), Dayton, Ohio, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 3/5 | 3/20 | Nov 15, 2002 God-awful, but with less calories. Crash (448), Macomb, Illinois, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | Nov 6, 2002
|