celluloiddroid (25) - Hebron, Indiana, USA - JUL 21, 2004
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Not bad, it had a good hop and malt taste. I may be biased though since I was camping all week and it was the first beer I’d had in a while.
ruggedman (647) - Portland, Maine, USA - JUL 21, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Decent middle of the road mass produced beer. Good beer if you’re starting to get used to hops. I dont really like something about it, perhaps it’s just not different enough. Good beer, but not a great beer.
farmboy (218) - Barwon Heads, AUSTRALIA - JUL 20, 2004
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JAN 8, 2006 I’d been meaning to grab one of these for quite a while but the price tag always put me off. Tried it from the bottle and found it to be a bit too metallic. Can’t explain it really. I won’t be rushing out to buy another one.
RE-RATE: on draught at many of the pubs I went to when on holidays in Boston in September 2005. Much better this time around, although not something I wanted to drink a lot of.
JonMoore (1981) - Loughborough, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - JUL 20, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pale amber colour. Small white head, quickly gone. Aroma is malty, with some hops and fruit. Taste is malty, maybe some light hops. Thin bodied with an average mouthfeel. Not bad, but nothing particularly great about it.
YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - JUL 18, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Part of a local tastting of a Sam Adams Brewmaster Mix Pack. Decent. Amber with white head. Floral, hops, malt nose. Light bodied. Flavor was clean and crisp and somewhat refreshing. Good Lawnmower beer.
Lou18 (1353) - West Paterson, New Jersey, USA - JUL 17, 2004
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
amber colored, white fluffy-head. Full feal, with nice hoppt bitter finish. A little after taste.
jimmack (1223) - Nutley, New Jersey, USA - JUL 12, 2004
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
Amber color with a nice fluffy white head that quickly dissipated. Slight
hop aroma. Taste is crisp, clean with a mild hop bitterness. OK, but not that great.
Pigfoot (2268) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - JUL 11, 2004
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Color is a pale amber, and a thick white head tops it off. Aroma is fresh and clean, sweet and malty, with herbal hints. Malt texture is excellent. Hops are in short supply, but there are enough to provide a little play on the palate. This lager is really all about the malt, though and it’s quite tasty, with a comfortable mouthfeel. Body is thoroughly on the thin side, and not 1/3 through the pint I’m feeling awfully bored. Not enough of what I like in a beer, but then I don’t normally drink this style. Well-constructed, and worth it’s popularity and prominence.
LiamPatrick16 (124) - Montgomery, New York, USA - JUL 11, 2004
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
not too bad for a decently large produced beer. Golden brown, and malty. good beer to sip on. im not screaming to go out and get more of it yet i will definatly try it again.
biznizness (1124) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JUL 7, 2004
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: SEP 14, 2004 I really like this beer. Nice and hoppy, more than I expected from the lager. The hops really do it for me. A nice option when all they have is macros.