Loddeer (171) - USA - OCT 16, 2004
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Yeah, it always is a good decision. I can agree with that annoying bastard who’s in the commercials. Who is that scumbag? Anyhoo, it’s a nice full bodied lager with a up tempo flavor and solid finish. For a readily available commercialized beer, it’s definitely a better choice than 9 out of 10 other options at your average restaurant.
IMtheOptimator (1164) - Bethel, Connecticut, USA - OCT 16, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Amber body with a white head. Mild aroma, with a taste that starts off malty but seems to have a somewhat bitter finish. Drinkable but lacking in complexity. One of the main beers some people drink to prove themselves better than the pale lager drinkers, but still this is nowhere near world-class. "You can travel around the world, but you still won’t find a better beer than Sam Adams." Well, yeah, you will. In fact, you’ll find lots of them. But for an American macrobrew, this isn’t half bad.
hellomynameis (876) - Mayer, Minnesota, USA - OCT 16, 2004
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
This is my fall back beer when more interesting brews aren’t available. It has a good sized head, and good lacing. The aroma is a bit sweet, but not too interesting. The taste is good, though I’m not so sure I like the hop aftertaste. I don’t usually like lagers, but this I’ll drink.
PatMac (17) - Wakefield, Massachusetts, USA - OCT 15, 2004
3.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 9/20
This is a great lager. If someone doesn’t like it, they probably wanted a stout. This beer is also not an IPA with suttle aromas. This is a solid lager with a good head and somewhat creamy texture. There is a hop after taste, but it is not bitter. If it comes out of the tap flat , send it back.
BeerRunner (144) - San Diego, California, USA - OCT 14, 2004
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
This is an *excellent* lager! Don’t let the ’beer snobs’ who only drink certain beers try to tell you otherwise. Is it perfect? No, of course not, but it is still quite excellent and I’m very, very impressed by this beer.
jefcon (1604) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - OCT 13, 2004
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not as bad as I thought this macro would be. On tap, it has a fair head and a caramel, orange color in the glass. Aromas are potpurri and caramel. Still, the brew is thin and sours a bit at the end.
BJM8 (17) - USA - OCT 11, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
O.K. if there’s nothing else available. Thin, tasteless, boring. Hardly any hops at all, thin head.
SDalkoholic (2318) - Linda Vista, California, USA - OCT 11, 2004
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
A gold amber body with a bone white head. Aroma has a sweet nectar smell. Has a honey and nectar flavor with a decent maltiness supporting it. I buy a 12 pack occasionally cuz its only $9 and is a quality beer to toss back on the palate while doing the trick.
MiP (15143) - Sønderborg, DENMARK - OCT 10, 2004
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Bottle. Amber colour, nice white head. Very nice, malty aroma. Very malty for a lager, mild bitterness. Not overly carbonated.
PWalk (337) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 5, 2004
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
I like this beer. Aroma isn’t intense but it does it’s job. Head lasts near forever in the glass. Just a real good beer that beats the hell out of sucking down a macro at the local watering hole.