AxeMaster221 (343) - Portland, Oregon, USA - APR 4, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not a micro but not Bud either. For the price there a so many micros that beat it, I just donít see myself buying it, but if Iím at a friends and this is whatís there iíll drink it.
MethodGod (7) - USA - APR 4, 2002 does not count
3.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
coldandhot99 (18) - Abingdon, Maryland, USA - APR 1, 2002
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This beer poured nicely with a thick head and beautiful color. It was just a little bitter for me.
Davhgbrew (845) - Coconut Creek, Florida, USA - MAR 31, 2002
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Itís been so long since the last time I had one of these that I hardly recognized it this time. I forgot that I didít mind it, but I probably couldnít drink more than a couple. I also thought it had a bit of a fruity flavor. Itís too bad this is the most highly distributed Boston brew, because itís hardly the best.
krisbierjaeger (844) - dolores, Colorado, USA - MAR 30, 2002
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
brewers are certainly allowed to brag a bit on thier labels, but this one informs us that itís íthe best beer in americaí, which for this plain-jane beer is reckless hyperbole, kind of like saying yasser arafat is kind of cute. whatís more, were told this one only uses íhonest ingredientsí. any ingredients caught lying are immediately banished, (and one must assume that the ingredients are asked some pretty embarrassing questions and subjected to brutal cross examination). fluff aside, this one does pour fresh smelling and heady, knotty pine yellow orange and brightly kristal. balanced nose, nothing assertive, good but not memorable. moderate sweetness, mild bitterness. i agree with odin that iíd never buy the stuff unless i was in some primitive wasteland where the only options were macros or abstension.
ghostwheel (43) - Hauppauge, New York, USA - MAR 29, 2002
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Good lager...Good taste.
Donít listen to the knucklehead below who gave this beer a 1 rating. Boston beer helped start this mass exodus from boring beers like bud and coors.
mkrill99 (28) - USA - MAR 26, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
This is Budweiser of microbrews, Just think of boston harbor,
twocycle99 (61) - Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA - MAR 26, 2002
4.3 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
Good color and aroma. Very smooth, strong taste
IslandHaole (1086) - Yokosuka-Shi, Kanagawa-Ken, JAPAN - MAR 25, 2002
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: DEC 25, 2004 Rerate: After drinking several cases of this over the past few months, I have grown to appreciate what a decent beer this is. I know, itís not a micro, but the damned best macro lager in the US.
Original rate-Wonderful amber hue and just as described a íhoppy, floral aromaí. A smooth drink but has a celery like quality that distracts from an otherwise very good Lager
jbrus (4992) - Delft, NETHERLANDS - MAR 23, 2002
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Pretty good for a lager. Until a few months ago (before I joined ratebeer.com) I was kind of afraid to drink US beers. My experiences with beers like Budweiser didnít make me buy more US beers. But this is indeed a beer that was worth trying. Nice cookie, caramel, flower aroma. Amber color, firm frothy head, good lacing. Full for a lager in start but gets a little thinner in the middle. Sweet, light cookie, flowers, good hops. Long hoppy finish as well.