on tap

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 4382   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.22/5   EST. CALORIES: 147   ABV: 4.9%
Samuel Adams Boston Lager® is the best example of the fundamental characteristics of a great beer, offering a full, rich flavor that is both balanced and complex. It is brewed using a decoction mash, a time consuming, traditional four vessel brewing process discarded by many contemporary brewers. This process brings forth a rich sweetness from the malt that makes it well worth the effort. Samuel Adams Boston Lager® also uses only the finest of ingredients including two row barley, as well as German Noble aroma hops. The exclusive use of two row barley not only imparts a full, smooth body but also gives the beer a wide spectrum of malt flavor ranging from slightly sweet to caramel to slightly roasted. The Noble hops varieties, Hallertau Mittelfruh and Tettnang Tettnanger, add a wide range of floral, piney and citrus notes, which are present from the aroma, through the flavor, to the lingering smooth finish. We take great pride in the Noble hops used in our beers. They are hand selected by Jim Koch and our other brewers from the world’s oldest hops growing area. Among the world’s most expensive, they cost twenty times as much as other hops.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
jeffc666 (1984) - Fairfax, Virginia, USA - JUL 27, 2003
If you are out to dinner often this is the best choice available. It is really not a bad beer. Very different, especially when it first came out. A nice hop aroma and flavor, somewhat surprising for a lager. The malt flavor , caramelly, is also there. As many have pointed out before me, it is better on draft than out of the bottle.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
Shagnasty (130) - Rochester, New York, USA - JUL 24, 2003
UPDATED: MAY 15, 2005 Not bad at all. Surprisingly full bodied for an American lager, with average head and lacing. Taste reminds me of a caramel since it is rather sweet and slightly syrupy. Tastes good and goes down smooth.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
DrnkMcDermott (3007) - Downers Grove, Illinois, USA - JUL 24, 2003
Draft. I have to render unto this beer its props for being, usually, the best choice you have available in most restaurant bars <i color=CC0011>(and a fine Chicago pizza scarfin' establishment like Giordano's should know better than to use iced-over glasses). Has a nice dark gold color, darker than any megabrew, under the usual lager head. The malt is very evident, almost but not quite a caramel aspect, again better than megabrewed "barley pop." Hop flavor is nicely balanced, bitterness doesn't really assert itself until after you swallow. Many beer fans have kind of a love-hate relationship with Jim Koch, but this is still the beer that makes his rep.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
MaBeer1972 (1837) - Taunton, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 18, 2003
This is the beer that got America drinking real beer again, isn't it? Thank goodness we didn't stop here. Pretty decent stuff, but not my favorite by any means. The draft is ten time better than the bottle.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
EKGoldings (637) - Radford, Virginia, USA - JUL 17, 2003
UPDATED: MAY 19, 2013 I much prefer the draft version. Excellent use of hops with great aroma and decent bitterness. Malt flavors come out more in draft that I’ve had than in bottles. For a mass produced and marketed beer, this is a good one. All of the elements of a great beer are there and the balance is as refined as any beer that I’ve tasted. Sam Adam’s best beer by far. 2012 update: I’ve had this several times recently and didn’t find the hops nearly as nice as I remembered. Maybe they’re diluting the mittlefreuh with tettnang, or maybe they had a bad crop. In any case, I was disappointed with my recent samplings. 2013 update: Drank one from the bottle the other night and a draft about a month ago. Really disappointing ... the sharp, clean hop character was gone. I asked about the keg and it was fresh, as was the bottle. Will the ghost of Joe Owades please come and clean up this mess?

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
whaleman (2178) - North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 15, 2003
UPDATED: SEP 27, 2004 Light amber color and very clear. Has more flavor than most American lagers but tastes artificial. Clingy cardboard aftertaste. I think that's the Samuel Adams trademark. I find this beer difficult to drink and think it is very overrated.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 17/20
Diablokev (165) - Lakewood, Colorado, USA - JUL 15, 2003
The aroma is of caramel. The appearance is a deep amber with a thick off white head. The flavor is slightly bitter, with hints of hops. The beer is smooth and crisp. Overall quite good.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
Fish (440) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUL 12, 2003
Still trying to expand my beer horizons. Nice copper color, decent head. Pretty lacing. And a slightly bitter finish. I actually enjoyed the Sam Adams Vienna style more I think. I paid about 8 dollars for a six pack.

   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
changxao (104) - South Carolina, USA - JUL 12, 2003
Good copper color, pours with a decent head and has good lacing. Similar to Bass Ale, more hops though. Readily availible and reasonably priced, a good step up beer for the drinker who wants to expand his horizons beyond macro brews.

   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
jercraigs (9872) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 10, 2003
UPDATED: NOV 5, 2007 October 2007. Bottle. Golden body with a small white head. Moderate hops in the aroma, light grassy notes with very light hints at citrus. Moderate bitterness throughout. Mild grainy middle, with brief light hint of bubblegum? Light citrus in the finish. Average palate is full for what it is. 6/3/6/3/13 - 3.1 <P>Jan 2001 - Decent but uninspiring. Found it to be a lot more malty than mainstream lagers but not exceptional. Worth trying again though. 6/3/5/3/10 - 2.7

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page  1 « 380 381 382  383  384 385 386 » 439

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
about us
About RateBeer
New Beers
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50