MarkMaclean (48) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 20, 2012
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
cereal, resin, amber, hazy, minimal head, lightly bitter, medium sweetness, medium body, lightly sour, soft carbonation, astringent,
ironprog (48) - - FEB 9, 2013
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
12 oz. bottle. Pours a clear, amber-orange with a frothy white head that lasts a long time. Aromas of citrus, grass, and hay. Taste is a bit bitter with a metallic "tinge" to it. It’s medium-bodied with a lightly creamy texture. Finish is on the dry side with a hint of orange. Carbonation is average.
In my book, this one is nothing special, yet it’s good enough that I would drink it again. Pleasing, but not outstanding.
Mlkluther (47) - Alberta, CANADA - JUL 24, 2013
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
341 bottle. Poured into a pilsner glass with 1 finger of head and left some lacing. It has a darker golden colour than many lagers. Again, comparing to other lagers it has more flavour. Clear and crisp. Some citrus which I find refreshing in a lager. Better than most of the mass produced lagers.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
beerdrinkingking (47) - Colorado, USA - FEB 18, 2002
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
ok beer would only drink on occasion
Rvrndmaynard (47) - Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, USA - APR 25, 2007
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
On tap at Mile Square in Hoboken. The only reason that i gave this beer a 5 for appearance is the nifty new glasses that Sam Adams came out with for this beer. Pretty standard swill though. All in all, i think i’m just not that big a fan of Jim Koch’s beers.
MichaelPerch (47) - DENMARK - FEB 15, 2008
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
the aftertaste is very bad. i don’t like it at all. sorry.
but it seems that it is very popular
DarkBeer (47) - Ohio, USA - AUG 6, 2008
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
I’m not a lager guy, but this is a good one, Nice amber pour, good head, nice oppy aroma, lovely clean taste,
rohash (47) - New York, USA - AUG 9, 2009
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Definitely a decent lager. Sweet, malty, light hop character. Nothing out of this world but OK.
papsdatank (47) - Michigan, USA - JUL 16, 2011
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours a light to medium amber with an off white head that leaves some but not a lot of lacing. The smell is led by caramel malts with some floral hops with the slightest bit of citrus. The taste follows the nose as it is also led by the caramel malts with a little bit of floral hoppiness. The palate leaves something to be desired, it’s somewhat light bodied but has a stickiness to it, it’s not bad, but for something this light I expect it to be refreshing to some degree.
Overall this is a pretty good beer, it’s not Pliny or KBS but it gets the job done.
soulrefugee (46) - Illinois, USA - NOV 25, 2001
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
I love this beer for how well it performs compared to how much I pay for it. It has the quality of some german or U.K. brews, but costs a good bit less. Its just as thick, hearty, and tasty as many of the european beers, and reminds me alot of some of the ’Octoberfest’ style beers they sell from germany. These are not those super thick strong beers, but are a bit lighter than that, yet way heartier than beers like Bud and Fosters. I picked this beer last, since it seemed like the biggest seller, I assumed that meant it would taste the most like a mainstream beer such as Bud. I was wrong, this is one of my favorites, if not my very favorite from Samuel Adam’s beers.