Bov (11952) - Bienne, SWITZERLAND - SEP 25, 2001
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I had this one under the name íLightshipí. Without doubts my favourite light beer.
faroeviking (10284) - FAROE ISLANDS - JAN 1, 2007
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Tasty easy to drink beer with low calories. Thin but still some good maltiness.
Crit (3817) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - JAN 14, 2003
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - NOV 16, 2002
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
While slightly better than the new SA Light, it was a light beer and thus deserves your scorn. Drink less, but better, as opposed to this. I drank a bit of this in the day and always felt cheated after I did.
PhillyBeer2112 (2757) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - FEB 17, 2006
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I like how now and again Iíll scour my old notes and find something not entered! First my memories of this: Always was surprised by how good this was, at least, as far as light beers went. It wasnít something I had regularly but never turned it down. My notes: darkish gold with a honeyed character (both aroma and flavor). Clean, boring. Medium bodied. Just enough hops.
BREWMUSKCLES (2558) - New Jersey, USA - SEP 6, 2007
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
IT WAS LIGHT AND REFRESHING. TASTED LIKE A LIGHT CARAMEL MALT AND THEN BEER. YEARS AGO IT HAD A BETTER MORE HOP FLAVOR. A BIT RESINY AND PINEY.
BroSpud (2049) - , Massachusetts, USA - FEB 13, 2009
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
I remember having one of these several years back and not liking it. It is good for what it is itís just that I donít like what it is. Better than most other light beers yet still tasting of water and lacking flavor.
dirtymike (2016) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - MAY 13, 2002
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Other than the bad name, I donít know why BBC gave up on this in favour of the present Light,itís been years since I had this beer,but I recall it being a great escape from ílightí beer without the lack of flavour of a craft brew.
Panzuriel (1952) - Westerville, Ohio, USA - AUG 21, 2002
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This one is nasty. I think I got the last bottle in Ohio. Then they stopped making this crap. Itís pretty light beer-ish with an attempt to spice things up. REally doesnít work all that well. Ends up being fizzy, watery and thin. Oh so thin.
RSRIZZO (1949) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - SEP 17, 2007
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Had this beer on 12/29/1997. It has a golden color with a little bit of a haze to it. The aroma is light and sweet. Carbonation is very high at first but slows down quickly. The taste of this beer is far better than any other light beer Iíve had. It starts off with a crisp body, similar to a good bodied American premium, and goes down refreshingly smooth. The finish is more like a Pale Ale than a Light beer, with the flavor of hops coming though and a mild bitterness on the tale end. This is a great beer and one of the best light beers ever made.