RateBeer
overall
13
39
style
Serve in Flute, Shaker

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1115   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.49   SEASONAL: Winter   EST. CALORIES: 177   ABV: 5.9%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Samuel Adams® Cranberry Lambic is a fruit beer that draws its flavor not just from the cranberries it is brewed with, but also from the unique fermentation character imparted by the rare wild yeast strain. The result is a flavor rich in fruitiness and reminiscent of cranberries and bananas, cloves and nutmeg. The yeast fermentation also will create a slight sourness on the sides of the palate, a signature of the original Lambic style which, with the subtle cereal note from the wheat malt, remind its drinker that, as fruity a beer as this is, it is still a beer.


2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
estoppel (1028) - Buffalo, New York, USA - NOV 19, 2002
UPDATED: NOV 6, 2007 Nose is more wheaty than lambic-like, color is light amber, head didn’t stick around for long. Not very sour. I don’t really taste the cranberries. Not complex. I’m not sure what they’re trying for with this one.

3.5
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
UnionMade (621) - Connecticut, USA - NOV 17, 2002
I don’t know my lambics, so I’m not sure if this is a good or bad one. I understand that the fruit should be dominating in the style, and it certainly is here. Very sweet, very tart, with a bit of a wheat beer taste in the back. I like cranberries, so I enjoyed this brew. Very much along the lines of their cherry wheat, in terms of fruit intensity and body.

3.5
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
beerguy101 (5287) - Newark, California, USA - NOV 16, 2002
RE-rate Medium gold color, medium head. Slightly fruit aroma. OK.. Its not really a lambic, but it’s a medium bodied fruit beer. Slightly tart, and somewhat sweet, slightly malty. There is a little of that sweet/sour taste thing going on here. Nice drinking beer, cranberry flavor is a little light, but its drinkable . Finish is clean and smooth. Aftertaste is slightly bitter, some sweetness in aftertaste.

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 7/20
Rockinout (966) - Kent, Ohio, USA - NOV 16, 2002
What the heck is this stuff? Has an artificial "butter" taste, earthy nose, only slight cranberry.

2.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 10/20
daalamar (405) - new albany, Indiana, USA - NOV 12, 2002
This is not a lambic and should not be labled as such. Overpoweringly sweet with a very subtle dry cranberry followup. Color is a yellow/pink with a small head. Aroma is about the only positive thing I could find with a sweet cranberry boquet. Bottom line "I didn’t like it, you may, but it’s still not a lambic"

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Tom Servo (424) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - NOV 8, 2002
Not that good. Severe presence of cranberry, and an almost sickeningly sweet smell. Has a hazy yellowish pink color to it. Small head.

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
HighGravity (926) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - NOV 8, 2002
(Best by 3/03) I am assuming a brettanomyces yeast culture is used to ferment this beer. The beer is a hazy pinkish/yellow. The nose has more maple syrup aromas than lambic aromas. The palate is medium in body and mildly acidic, but not acidic as a true lambic. I think this beer should be renamed maple lambic with cranberry. The maple flavors really over power the cranberries. Even with all the strange flavors in this beer, the pasteurization comes through fairly noticeable and contributes negatively to this ale.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
freekyp (1537) - Thomasville, North Carolina, USA - NOV 5, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 28, 2007 A lame attempt at a Lambic and my least favorite of the Sam Adams line. Aroma is vegatal with a berry sweetness arriving late and in a sickly fashion. Pours a fizzy pink with a puny weak white head. The flavor is much the same with a long tart ending that turns sickly sweet like rotten fruit, and a light body. I would probably like it better if they never called it a Lambic (which it’s not). Do yourself a favor and break out a Lindeman’s Lambic.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Hopistotle420 (1178) - Amherst, Massachusetts, USA - OCT 29, 2002
UPDATED: APR 11, 2003 Hazy golden honey hue. Sweet hopped up aroma. Small white head. Obviously this isnt a lambic, its not spontaneously fermented, yet this beer is very enjoyable. Wheat is evident, and cranberry flavor is very enjoyable. Maple syrup notes are barely noticeable, but definately there. Ive enjoyed this brew for many years. A holiday classic.

2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Allseeingeye (223) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - OCT 25, 2002
Bleeeck! This is there interpretation of lambic. It’s definatly cranberry. Golden color with a decent head. Can taste some malt under all this fruit tartness. Doubt I’ll try this again.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 102 103 104  105  106 107 108 » 112


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50