dwr1962 (47) - Wellsburg, West Virginia, USA - JUN 30, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 6/20
There are a lot of descriptions listed here, I won’t attempt to add much. My notes: The appearance is fine, but almost no lacing. The aroma is very mild, but not cheap-smelling. The taste is mild (as described by others). The description by the company shows a lot of imagination. Maybe the subtle citrus note and delicate aroma of Jasmine escaped me. Overall, I don’t think it’s a great addition to the SA. collection. It’s a decent beer, but below their average.
onceblind (4014) - Denver, Colorado, USA - AUG 23, 2011
2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Clear pale golden with a thin head. Subtle perfumey aroma of cryastal malts and floralness. Taste was crisp and pale, but not much in it.Light sweetness, no bitterness, a little bready. Hard to find the flavor. Drinkable and smells great, just so flavorless...
klas (265) - SWEDEN - JUN 29, 2012
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
citrus, golden, clear, minimal head, lightly bitter, medium body, average carbonation, astringent. Bought this beer as part of a 12-pack with 6 different varities and two bottles of each. Samuel adams used to be a favourite, but most beers in this 12-pack wasn’t that exciting.
johnnysmoke (101) - Houston, Texas, USA - JUL 10, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not my cup of tea, too light and well... too light. Pours yellow with a thick white. Very carbonated and extremely light bodied. Kind of a sour aftertaste. This is a good beer for someone making the transition from Bud or Coors.
junon (410) - Honolulu, Hawaii, USA - APR 5, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
This absolutely bland. Why did they even bother with this crap? Another example of Sam Adams spreading themselves too thin.
matthewjk (901) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - AUG 27, 2011
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A pertinent question: Does this beer suck mass ballz? Yes, yes it does. Hazy piss yellow with lots of flotsam. Distracting yeastiness.
ScoWRee (378) - Perkiomen, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 2, 2011
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pour a clear golden color with a thick white foamy head. Aroma is slightly hoppy. Taste is a little watery. Slight hops, very light citrus.. I’m not feeling the love. A big Sam Adams fan. Not on this one.
pkbites (678) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 22, 2012
1.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Wait a minute......? What the fuck are some of you talking about/?Please email me with the answer? This is an average looking pour with some lacing on the glass and a decent nose. But it doesn’t taste like anything. No flavor whatsoever. I really don’t care what a beer looks loke so much as what it taste like. This tastes like tap water with a little lawn grass and hops added=nothing!!!!!!&
Syzzer (590) - Oregon, USA - NOV 30, 2011
1.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: DEC 28, 2011 This is a boring, watery beer with a soury close. There is not much difference of this and a poor pilsner. Decent carbonation. Urine yellow appearance, Very very very very very slight floral flavor when room temp.
BillHick420 (424) - North Dakota, NORWAY - MAR 25, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pours clear straw with a white head. Aroma:? Taste:?
Very bland and boring,