brewmaster55 (48) - , Wisconsin, USA - APR 10, 2009
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Pours a cloudy amber with minimal head. Hints of orange in both aroma and tastes. Can taste the alcohol in a pleasant way. First Imperial Series from Samuel Adams that I have tried, picked up several others, hope that they are like this one, recommend.
trancecyclist (44) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 29, 2011
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
12-oz draft in a tulip at Flaniganís Boathouse in Conshohocken. I didnít order this in order to beat on the Sam Adams Brewing Corp. But.... The end result is a beer that in no way resembles a wit, EVEN if does have wheat grains, coriander, and orange peel. It arrives as a dark orange, with a decent head. The taste is essentially as if someone blended a Belgian golden ale with a dubbel. If it was made with a similar proportion of wheat and barley that wits are, well, the wheat characteristics of the flavor of a 10.5% alcohol "wit" are long gone. The sweetness is very pronounced. Again, "Imperial White", even if factually true in its brewing, is misleading in the end. Not a bad beer as such, but it doesnít put one in the mind of a wit by any stretch of the imagination.
Bella68 (42) - Alabama, USA - JUL 25, 2009
2.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Definitely not white in color, very cloudy with a thin head. Citrusy aroma. Full bodied to the point it reminded me of a sweetened syrup. Not a fav of mine.
Byrdman (41) - Maryland, USA - JAN 29, 2011
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Light brown with lacy head that is tenacious. Fruitcake and alcohol on the nose. Starts hoppy fading into characteristic Belgian taste. Average carbonation, incredibly full body.
OTownKnight (38) - Orlando, Florida, USA - AUG 3, 2010
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
12oz. bottle poured into an English pint glass. Pours an amber/copper color with a white foamy head. Thick lacing though the finish. Alcohol is definitely the strongest first impression, it takes awhile to get used to it. If you donít consume high abv beers frequently it will take awhile to be able to enjoy this beer without being overwhelmed by the high alcohol content. Has a champagne-like taste, I personally could not detect any citrus/orange flavor, although certain fruits can be slightly detected in the aroma and taste. 10.3% ABV is nothing to mess around with, one of these beers can give you a buzz. Only one of these is equivalent to three light beers in terms of abv.
Although the alcohol is overpowering at first, halfway through it becomes enjoyable and it does live up to its description as an interesting brew. Very tasty and memorable. I am now anxious to try the rest of the Sam Adams imperial series after this white ale.
Only problem I have with this beer is that it does not taste anything like a witbier. Just had my last Hoegaarden yesterday and the two donít even compare. They may be brewed in the same fashion with the same hops, wheat, etc. but taste is not similar at all. Donít expect a typical white beer taste from this one (note the copper color in the first place). Final score: 16/20
For fans of: Champagne
High ABV beers
Haast (37) - Texas, USA - DEC 5, 2009
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Bottle poured into imperial pint glass. Dark, hazy copper color with minimal head. Unique in that it retains some hefeweizen-like properties (banana, orange, coriander falvors) while having the thick body and mouthfeel of a doppelbock or strong ale. Slightly sour flavor with a distinct alcohol taste. A good "winterized" version of hefeweizen.
beernightscout (37) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - DEC 15, 2012
4.5 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
Pours dark tan, looks like a barleywine, not a witbeer; I was initially concerned I got a mislabeled bottle. But the aroma smells like a sweet wit, fruity and almost bubble gum. Taste is amazing, very sweet for a wit with a strong coconut flavor. If you told me this was a coconut beer, Iíd believe you. Very thick, which I am looking for in these "imperial" versions of regular styles. Not hot at all, the alcohol is barely there. There is a bit of wit beer still in this beer, but Iím glad to see Sam Adams take this over the top and make something that defies classification. Though I am giving it the slightest deduction in points for not really tatsing like a wit...I loved it.
Yatesed (37) - Blacklick, Ohio, USA - JUL 6, 2013
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Poured golden haze, one finger head, taste of carmel hits right away with several other flavors overwhelming the palate. Too busty for my taste.
dekeq (36) - Long Valley, New Jersey, USA - NOV 2, 2009
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Poured into the glass it produced a very nice, opaque, golden-hued beer. It had a nice film around the edge after the head settled. The aroma consisted of a lot of hops. It was also pretty sweet - reminded me a little of traditional Samuel Adams Boston Lager. Aside from this, it was a pretty complex scent and I couldnít pick everything out. As for the taste, there wasnít much to say at the start of it but at the end there was a hit of everything. There was a nice combination of barley and spices and a slight bite from the aforementioned barley and alcohol content. This was a pretty smooth beer but it was a little unbalanced in terms of taste-flow. It started with not much of anything, kicks you with a spice and it ends bitter. It reminded me a little of Chimay White in terms of overall flow.
irishalky (35) - Littleton, Massachusetts, USA - NOV 27, 2010
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I was not anticipating how smooth, velvety, and strong this beer would taste. Pours an orange amber and thicker than most Wits. Does not go down as light as a true Wit. Contains a strange blend of the lighter Wit with the heavier stronger Imperial taste. Did not work for me.