DrRobert99 (2) - Nurmes, FINLAND - JAN 31, 2002 does not count
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
The only good thing in this beer is that it is strong. Drinkability poor, tastes awful, do not buy whole bottle!
joelumbumbard99 (13) - Alabama, USA - JAN 24, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
What a great idea for a venison marinade! This should go on RateWine.com (if there is such a place). Couldn’t finish the bottle. Worst money I have ever spent on beer! And I have even bought Busch Light before!
carlitos99 (184) - The Big Apple, USA - JAN 23, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
cool bottle, lots of alcohol, but it taste like sweet wine syrup. not beer.
RyanD99 (7) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 3, 2002 does not count
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
What the hell was Samuel Adam’s thinking? A barley wine triple bock brewed with maple syrup??? Yuck. I like the alcohol content, though.
BuKKet99 (39) - Republic of Texas, USA - DEC 31, 2001
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Very much like motor oil. This was apparently Koch’s first attempt at high alkie creations. Inferior to the SA Millennium, which is also a curiosity but actally tastes good.
NYDennis (64) - Port Jefferson Station, New York, USA - DEC 29, 2001
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I just hated it. I saw it in the store and heard that it was rare so I bought it. Not my type of beer at all.
All4Grog99 (22) - Albany, New York, USA - DEC 21, 2001
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
After some time spent searching for the elusive beer i was disappointed in discovering why it
was so difficult to find. from the moment i opened the bottle i was assaulted with the smell of
soy sauce and maple syrup. Bravely i poured the $6 bottle into the snifter vainly hoping that it
would taste better than it smelled. Sorrowfully my hopes were dashed as i took the first sip to
discover that it indeed tasted like an alcoholic soy sauce with notes of worchestshire and a strong
maple syrup finish. ick...All was not lost though, it may not be the best for drinking but it does
make a great marinade, try it with cracked pepper on venison.
SirQuackalot (10) - USA - DEC 12, 2001
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Ugh, just ugh. Tastes like thin, highly alcoholic maple syrup. No carbonation really, smelled heavily of maple, but looked somewhat impressive, especially in its blue bottle. Not worth it.
fuchebu (146) - Croydon, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 10, 2001
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
This is an achievement in some ways but at times it can seem arbitrary. It’s okay for late night sipping on a winter night when the high alcohol will have quite the soothing effect.
PhillyBeer2112 (2710) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - DEC 10, 2001
1.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: AUG 7, 2003 I'm re-rating this because I feel that my earlier notes were too forgiving (and a rating of 3.0 was too high). If one wanted to homebrew something like this, I would advice them to mix up some molasses, soy sauce, cough syrup, brandy, maple syrup and a little vanilla extract, and that would get them close. I don't mind its unbeerness - I love the Dogfish Head World Wide Stout - this is just unpalatable. I'll have a shot at trying one after its aged about 10 years (or more).
Final Note: never could understand why they called this 'Triple Bock'. Its not a bock in any sense of the word.<P>
One more time at it: a 1997 vintage sampled in 2003. The longest aged sampling I've had of it. It could surely go more, but if it isn't drinkable now, will it ever be? Dark dirty brown opaque appearance, totally still. Oily texture in the glass. Aroma is dominantly fruity (fig, raisin) and alcoholic, moderately roasted, with soy sauce. Moderately acrid, no maple in the nose. Quite pungent and complex but not pleasing. Sweetish up front, with figgy notes, overwhelming acrid coating in the mouth, some soy sauce and licorice notes (cough syrup), and burning finish. Lingering wood. Some port-like notes, but long bitterness leaves only a hint of dessert wine. I could manage to finish a 4oz serving of this, but I wouldn't enjoy it much -but at least I'll bump the numbers up a little. In the end, it needs alot of work to be a good beer - they've done much better with the Utopias.