RateBeer
Home >

Samuel Adams Triple Bock

 (RETIRED)
overall
25
2
style
Serve in Snifter

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Local Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1059   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.81   SEASONAL: Special   EST. CALORIES: 540   ABV: 18%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Triple Bock is complex, elegant, and has the depth and complexity of a fine cognac, vintage port or an old sherry. Non-carbonated, ruby-black, and very special, Triple Bock should be sipped from a small snifter in a two-ounce serving. This is a beer to savor, and sip slowly. Triple Bock has a brandy-like warmth and a complex melange of fruity, woody, and toffee-like flavors. Let the aroma fill your mouth and nose with rich malt and fruit overtones. Savor and appreciate its enormous character. Serve Triple Bock as you would a fine sherry, at room temperature, in a small snifter. One bottle generously serves two or three. Recork and store standing up. Once poured into a small glass, the layers of aroma and flavor will continue to evolve as the deep ruby brew warms in the hand.

There have been only three vintages produced: 1994, 1995 and 1997, but bottles can still be found in the marketplace. 1994 and 1995 vintages are marked as such on the back label; 1997 vintage is not.


1.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 6/20
PhillyCraft (4071) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 2, 2012
Bottle from bill, 95 vtg, pour is thick deep brown with no head or lacing. Very syrupy mouth with notes of soy sauce and gouda. Smaller flavors of toffee, sugar, and more sugary syrup. Almost tasted like a worse jw lees if thatís possible. This one was old so I tried it, but I hate Sam Adams and other publicly traded macro type producers.

2.7
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
jredmond (6384) - Manhattan, New York, USA - SEP 1, 2012
UPDATED: SEP 4, 2012 95í Bottle at bills. Thanks to bill. Pours a deep, thick soy sauce body. aroma is thick molasses, chocolate, booze and soy sauce. Mouthfeel is thick and starts out great with notes that the aroma would suggest. The finish is horrible, thick, cough syrup medicinal finish.

3.4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
reggiedunlop (3470) - The dub c, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 7, 2012
1994 bottle...pours black...no head...syrupy looking. Aroma is boozy with raisn/fig...lightly winey like a port...a bit of chocolate covered cherry. Flavor is sweet with raisin/fig/prune and chocolate cherry...not boozy. Mouthfeel is full and liquory...sticky with a sugar sweet raisin/cherry/chocolate finish.

0.7
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Huhzubendah (3068) - Washington DC, USA - AUG 2, 2012
1995 Vintage Review #500 I had never had this legendary beer. I decided to pull it out for my 500th review. The beer appears lifeless and still, with a few bubbles of head that pop instantly and leave no lacing. The liquid itself is a very dark brown, near black color. Taking into account the nature of the beer and the fact that itís fifteen years old, I canít dock the appearance too harshly. My God, what in the hell took place inside this bottle for the last decade and a half?!? Imagine ordering pho soup and upending a giant bottle of ancient fish sauce into it until the bowl is spilling over. Next, add a few cups of the worldís most pungent soy sauce, then pour the whole thing into a bucket. Leave it outside for a few days, giving some homeless guys the opportunity piss in it at their leisure, so it can start to really reek like something foul and abysmal. Next, saute a frying pan full of raisins, sugar, brown sugar, caramel candies, prune juice, and old coffee grinds (Maxwell House or Folgerís - donít use anything expensive) on the stove, scorching the entire mixture into black oblivion for approximately one hour. Take this culinary mishap and scoop it into the bucket. Seal the whole concoction off and age it for nearly a generation and...Voila! Exactly what you might expect - an undrinkable, strong, vile, nasty beverage. Drain, beer. Beer, drain. Serving type: bottle Reviewed on: 12-10-2010

3.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
madmitch76 (18659) - , Essex, ENGLAND - JUL 28, 2012
23rd October 2010
Opaque very dark brown beer, no head, no carbonation. Nose is mostly marmite but has a little chocolate. Palate is semi soft and dry. So to the taste - wasnít expecting much from this much maligned beer but Iím going to stand with my old mucker Henrik Papso on this and say itís a fine beer. Immediately reminded me of a vintage port. Rich cherry - blackcurrant and a little tobacco. There is a big splash of Madeira in here as well and then chocolate, coffee and marmite. Finishes dry with a warming afterglow. You just need to get past the nose to appreciate this one!

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 7/20
redtechnj (265) - Williamstown, New Jersey, USA - JUL 27, 2012
This beer, if you call it a beer, is extremely hard to describe. I bought 2 bottles in í95, had one then and thought it was horrible. Since then Iíve expanded my beer horizons, my experiences with out of the norm beers was limited to Sam Addams various flavors. I recently found the second bottle in the back of my liqour cabinet and thought that maybe I had caught up to the complexities of this beer. Nope. Iíll try almost anything and come away if not happy with the beer but with the wxperience of trying something different. I canít in any way recomend trying this beer. Aroma of mollassas and whischestershier sauce. Bitter and horrible. This "beer" scared me!

4
   AROMA 9/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
Steasy66 (1086) - Minnesota, USA - JUL 24, 2012
Small bottle into snifter, we donít know the vintage. A Black no carbonation S Big marshmallow smells T Complex, strange, sweet, cherry, port, soy sauce M Thick, no carbonation O I like this beer, would drink it again, it is strange and complex, I can understand some of the hate, but I also enjoy the beer. Serving type: bottle Reviewed on: 04-14-2012 18:21:55

2.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
deyholla (8347) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - JUL 8, 2012
Bottle. Pours a thick black with a brown head that starts at the edges and dissipates completely. Aroma has a deep dark dessert wine with some caramel, sweet fruit and a slight astringent note. Flavor has noted of dark fruit and a bit of sweetness with a hint of astringent acid.

4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
OleR (4804) - Oslo, NORWAY - JUN 3, 2012
Sampled from a 0.25 L bottle (1997 vintage). Thanks for sharing, GrOve! Near black with no clarity. Headless. Big chocolate aroma. Strong licorice tones. A noticable alcohol scent, reminiscent of fortified wine. Fat malt body. Gently sweet and packed with chocolate-accented flavors. Vinous, like a fine Port. Notes of soy sauce and salty licorice. Thick and hot in the mouth. Impressingly complex. A great beer experience.

4.3
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 18/20
jdpeebs (686) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAY 21, 2012
250ml Bottle-1995 Vintage. Fantastic woody and fruity notes. Pours like good port. Little to carbonation, but thatís expected for the style. Very complex beer. I love it


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 3 4 5  6  7 8 9 » 106


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50