RateBeer
overall
39
99
style
Brewed by Samuel Smith
Style: Pale Lager
Tadcaster, England

bottled
common

on tap
available

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 644   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.95   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bottle: Pasteurised
A full-bodied lager with lots of malt and hop character. A touch hoppier than many lagers yet perfectly balanced with lots of fruity hop character and fragrance.


2.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
BeerLimey (2154) - California, USA - JUN 8, 2002
Apart from hints of oak and a restrained hoppiness I get very little from this brew. I can understand why Samuel needs a lager to complete its portfolio but it already has a decent one in its Pure Brewed Lager. So why do they need an Organic Ale and an Organic Lager. This is a disappointment from such a great brewer of classic ale styles.

3.1
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - APR 19, 2002
Pours a nice clear gold color, fluffy off white head and fair lace. Nose is malt, slightly earthy, clean and crisp. Front is slightly malt sweet, the top light, the finish is acidic, dry, and moderate carbonation, hops are light, but present. As I normally don’t care for lagers/pils, this one is clean and fresh, and a good beer for the ’Long Hot Summer Months’.

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
Ernest (6154) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - MAR 17, 2002
UPDATED: FEB 22, 2011 Bottle. Head is initially small, frothy/fizzy, white, mostly diminishing. Body is clear light to medium yellow. Aroma is lightly malty (grain, husks), lightly to moderately hoppy (flowers, herbs), with a strong note of soap. Flavor is moderately sweet, lightly bitter. Finish is lightly sweet, lightly to moderately bitter, slightly unclean, slightly husky. Light to medium body, watery texture, lively carbonation. Bland and not very clean...aroma has a lot of Ivory soap.

2.7
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 13/20
Davhgbrew (929) - Coconut Creek, Florida, USA - MAR 4, 2002
I’ve gotten so used to Samuel Smith brews being so top noch, that the mediocrity of this beer surprised me. For a lager it isn’t bad and very drinkable, but by no means does it compare with the quality of their other beers.

2.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - FEB 10, 2002
Yikes. This beer is better than the sum of its parts. Very light, but finely made.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
muzzlehatch (4424) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - JAN 4, 2002
Rather a disappointment. I remember how I first got into ’fat Sammys’ at Dead shows in the early 90s -- but it must have been fat Brown Ales and Oatmeal Stouts, ’cause this is rather dull and ordinary. Nice malty/bready nose, but flavor is rather weak and the hops are a little too strong in this underpowered beer.

3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 13/20
21iceman40 (1731) - vienna, West Virginia, USA - OCT 28, 2001
UPDATED: MAR 1, 2003 unique and bold flavor that is still light. Crisp also comes to mind. Spicy/ earthy, not hoppy enough for me

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
canary dog (655) - Rutland, Vermont, USA - SEP 13, 2001
Not as fulfilling as I thought it would be. Has that typical cold mouthfeel of a European lager, with that slight honey/plastic taste. Certainly lacks the diacetyl of the other Sammy brews. Okay thirst quencher, but nothing special.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
joet (2137) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - SEP 5, 2001
Clean, light half-bodied beer. Sans stink. Crisp and pleasant. Very nice lager.

3.8
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
groovinhigh (170) - Asheville, North Carolina, USA - AUG 12, 2001
Similar to the Pure Brewed Lager, but not as flavorful or refined. Well made and enjoyable enough, but I why drink this instead of the Pure Brewed Lager?


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 61 62 63  64  65


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50