saxo (16989) - Hřjbjerg, Aarhus, DENMARK - JAN 27, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Medium head with medium duration. Color is pale golden. Aroma and taste are malt, citrus notes and hops.
wlajwl (5840) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - DEC 26, 2011
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Relatively fruity for a pale lager with a decent bready malt backbone. Better than what I was expecting, a decent pale lager.
OleR (4804) - Oslo, NORWAY - OCT 29, 2011
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Can, shared by GeirOve. Biggish white head. Pale yellow, fizzy body. Harsh corn and lightly skunked hops on the nose. Thin and watery, with a harsh and grainy malt charcter. Notes of lemonade. Short watered down ending. Highly forgettable.
larsga (7314) - Oslo, NORWAY - OCT 23, 2011
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Small white head doesn’t last. Clear pale yellow body. Cardboard and wet socks aroma (WTF?) with floral compost notes. Mild mealy taste of nothing at all. Mild mouthfeel. Light, slightly thin, body. Dryish mealy aftertaste with slightly harsh herbal notes. Could be a lot worse. (0.33l can shared by gr0ve.)
Bart (2938) - Brussels, BELGIUM - AUG 21, 2011
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Golden blond coloured beeer with a short white head and medium carbonation. Skunky malty hinted rather strange aroma. Medium palate. Finish is sweet, very short with some very light malty grainy hints. Not good.
solidfunk (7709) - Washington D.C., Washington DC, USA - JUL 20, 2011
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Very average. Unremarkable, no characteristics, no defining taste or smell. Just watery grain alcohol. The beer isn’t light in alcohol, apparently it just has less calories, and though the brewer’s pale pilsen is slightly better, it’s not that much better - you might as well drink the light in Philippines where San mig is the only choice anyway.
ClubGonzo (5468) - Bergen, NORWAY - JUL 15, 2011
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Can from Thai supermarket. Sour stale malts, sulphur hints and aroma of cardboard. What’s not to like? :-P
dwyerpg (5683) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - MAY 15, 2011
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This is nowhere near as good as the regular. This is basically just pale lager swill, created to make money only.
rmussman (1701) - California, USA - MAY 6, 2011
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Oh man. I don’t know what to say about this because we all know it is basically filapino bud light!
tkrjukoff (4306) - SWEDEN - JAN 11, 2011
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pours clear pale golden with a decent longlived huge white head leaving very pretty lacing. Good carbonation. Aroma is slightly grainy and sweet. Crispy mouthfeel. Flavor is acidy, watery, crisp and slightly sweet. Watery sweet palate. Not much of a finish to talk about.