RateBeer
Home >

San Miguel Premium All-Malt

overall
4
4
style
Brewed by San Miguel
Style: Premium Lager
Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Serve in Lager glass

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 33   MEAN: 1.95/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.05/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
The full flavor of malt,the aroma of hops, and San Miguel’s golden brew satisfy every discriminating palate to complement one’s unending zest for life.


2.7
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
chinchill (4263) - South Carolina, USA - AUG 17, 2016
On tap in Scotland in 2016. This is a typical macro-lager: good looking, mild aroma, blase flavor. It’s best characteristic may be the extremely durable white head. Although it has no obvious flaws, other than being rather mild, it lacks flavor, character and interest.

1.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
Capa (2723) - Kitsap, Washington, USA - MAY 23, 2016
Watery golden. Slight sweetness. Mostly tasteless. Full of harsh carbonation. Quenches the thirst, but offers little else. I prefer the standard SM.

2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 7/20
donandres (355) - , Washington, USA - JAN 5, 2016
Bottle poured to pint glass very cold beer Appearance: Light orange, minimal head, a lot of lacing Aroma: Strong scent smell of alcohol, nothing else Taste: not really great Mouth feel: very carbonated Overall: good beer for the hot weather in the Philippines, and to get drunk quickly at the fastest rate and the most inexpensive way

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Rasmus40 (17528) - Beder, Aarhus, DENMARK - DEC 20, 2015
Bottle brought home from the Philippines by a friend. Clear golden with a small off-white head. Aroma is sweet, malty and corn. Flavor is medium sweet and light bitter. Dry and light bitter finish. Watery. 201215

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
Darkmagus82 (2263) - - NOV 29, 2015
Poured from bottle into a pint glass Appearance – The beer pours a clear golden amber color with a one finger head of pure white foam. The head fades very fast leaving only a trace of lace on the sides of the glass. Smell – The aroma of the brew is very skunky with a moderately strong smell of grain and hay. Along with these smells comes some sweet aromas of a corn syrup, producing a rather skunky adjunct aroma overall. Taste – The taste begins with a bit of corn syrup sweetness mixed with some bready tastes. As the taste advances some grassy and hay flavors develop along with a little bit of skunk. In the end, a little bit of caramel and grain come to the tongue as well. Mouthfeel – The body of the brew is thin with a carbonation level that is rather average. More carbonation and even less body would have likely been better for the skunky, corny, and grainy tastes of the brew. Overall – Not a very good brew in my mind. If I am looking for an adjunct I would much rather go a Bud, Coors, or Miller over this. Not really a worthy competitor in the adjunct category.

2.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
GuideDogSaint (1183) - Xiamen, CHINA - MAY 6, 2015
330ml bottle from Market Place by Jasons, Hong Kong. Pours clear golden with a dissipating white head. Metallic aroma of malt, a bit odd, with a sweet finish.

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
Grumbo (1340) - Ipswich, Suffolk, ENGLAND - MAR 30, 2015
Another one from PH courtesy of Richard. Cheers! Poured a deep amber colour with a small white head. Aroma is very sweet, and malty. Heavily sweet to taste, no bitterness. Light body, thin texture, quite fizzy. Not a good beer, tasted better no-alcohol malt drinks.

1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
Marduk (6324) - Reval, ESTONIA - JAN 16, 2015
330ml can (thanks Ares). Pale yellow color. Tiny size, white head, stays. Alcohol, malty, burnt plastic in aroma. Malty, sour, raw plastic in taste. Just plain awful. Massive thanks to people who shared that can with me. I owe you one!

1.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
FatPhil (13867) - Tallinn, ESTONIA - JAN 16, 2015
330ml can - Thanks Ares’ mate!
Bland aroma, but what is there is fruity and very sickly. I fear for my eyesight. Disgusting tomato taste. Some glue too. Pale gold, some odd flecky floating bits. Almost a horror. Yeugh, no, actually a horror. Sickly tomato, and god-knows-what chemicals.

3.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
neontb (59) - - DEC 18, 2014
One notch above Pale Pilsen version. This one they don’t cut with sugar. Its a faint difference but slightly noticeable in the strength of the flavor. I ranked this lower though since it doesn’t get the "readily available and cheap as heck" bonus points that the regular version gets. Cheers.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2 3 4


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50