chinchill (4263) - South Carolina, USA - AUG 17, 2016
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
On tap in Scotland in 2016.
This is a typical macro-lager: good looking, mild aroma, blase flavor. It’s best characteristic may be the extremely durable white head. Although it has no obvious flaws, other than being rather mild, it lacks flavor, character and interest.
Capa (2723) - Kitsap, Washington, USA - MAY 23, 2016
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Watery golden. Slight sweetness. Mostly tasteless. Full of harsh carbonation. Quenches the thirst, but offers little else. I prefer the standard SM.
donandres (355) - , Washington, USA - JAN 5, 2016
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle poured to pint glass very cold beer
Appearance: Light orange, minimal head, a lot of lacing
Aroma: Strong scent smell of alcohol, nothing else
Taste: not really great
Mouth feel: very carbonated
Overall: good beer for the hot weather in the Philippines, and to get drunk quickly at the fastest rate and the most inexpensive way
Rasmus40 (17528) - Beder, Aarhus, DENMARK - DEC 20, 2015
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle brought home from the Philippines by a friend. Clear golden with a small off-white head. Aroma is sweet, malty and corn. Flavor is medium sweet and light bitter. Dry and light bitter finish. Watery. 201215
Darkmagus82 (2263) - - NOV 29, 2015
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Poured from bottle into a pint glass
Appearance – The beer pours a clear golden amber color with a one finger head of pure white foam. The head fades very fast leaving only a trace of lace on the sides of the glass.
Smell – The aroma of the brew is very skunky with a moderately strong smell of grain and hay. Along with these smells comes some sweet aromas of a corn syrup, producing a rather skunky adjunct aroma overall.
Taste – The taste begins with a bit of corn syrup sweetness mixed with some bready tastes. As the taste advances some grassy and hay flavors develop along with a little bit of skunk. In the end, a little bit of caramel and grain come to the tongue as well.
Mouthfeel – The body of the brew is thin with a carbonation level that is rather average. More carbonation and even less body would have likely been better for the skunky, corny, and grainy tastes of the brew.
Overall – Not a very good brew in my mind. If I am looking for an adjunct I would much rather go a Bud, Coors, or Miller over this. Not really a worthy competitor in the adjunct category.
GuideDogSaint (1183) - Xiamen, CHINA - MAY 6, 2015
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
330ml bottle from Market Place by Jasons, Hong Kong. Pours clear golden with a dissipating white head. Metallic aroma of malt, a bit odd, with a sweet finish.
Grumbo (1340) - Ipswich, Suffolk, ENGLAND - MAR 30, 2015
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Another one from PH courtesy of Richard. Cheers! Poured a deep amber colour with a small white head. Aroma is very sweet, and malty. Heavily sweet to taste, no bitterness. Light body, thin texture, quite fizzy. Not a good beer, tasted better no-alcohol malt drinks.
Marduk (6324) - Reval, ESTONIA - JAN 16, 2015
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
330ml can (thanks Ares). Pale yellow color. Tiny size, white head, stays. Alcohol, malty, burnt plastic in aroma. Malty, sour, raw plastic in taste. Just plain awful. Massive thanks to people who shared that can with me. I owe you one!
FatPhil (13867) - Tallinn, ESTONIA - JAN 16, 2015
1.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
330ml can - Thanks Ares’ mate!
Bland aroma, but what is there is fruity and very sickly. I fear for my eyesight. Disgusting tomato taste. Some glue too. Pale gold, some odd flecky floating bits. Almost a horror. Yeugh, no, actually a horror. Sickly tomato, and god-knows-what chemicals.
neontb (59) - - DEC 18, 2014
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
One notch above Pale Pilsen version. This one they don’t cut with sugar. Its a faint difference but slightly noticeable in the strength of the flavor. I ranked this lower though since it doesn’t get the "readily available and cheap as heck" bonus points that the regular version gets. Cheers.