monk191 (366) - California, USA - NOV 17, 2012
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A not-so-bad amber. Pours a nice orange-red color with not much was. Not much smell, slightly nutty, maybe some caramel. Taste is very creamy and nutty. Had on tap at the brewery
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Zymurgeist2 (624) - Redwood City, California, USA - APR 18, 2013
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle to glass. This is not so bad. Heavy malt aroma with slight paper and a little butter. Clear deep-orange with full off-white head. Malty with slight bitterness and a harsh bite at the end. Slightly oxidize taste as well.
HughConway (658) - Washington, USA - MAR 7, 2011
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Draft at brewhouse. Pours amber, light head. Sweet malt, sweet malt, sweet malt. Not my pint oíbeer.
Ungstrup (26216) - Citizen of the universe, DENMARK - NOV 21, 2010
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Draft. A light amber beer with a beige head. The aroma has notes of malt combined with lighter notes of caramel and butter. The flavor is sweet with notes of butter and straw, leading to a dry buttery finish. I wonder if it is a brewing flaw or a dirty draft line that the butter stems from.
jrob21 (2010) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - FEB 8, 2010
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
22 oz bomber. A little lacking in anything that is memorable in an amber ale and a little astringent on the palate. Sort of fruity caramel aroma. Flavor is kind of sour? infected or purposefully done. I am inclined to think the former since there is not much else to bring this back to a well crafted beer.
SamGamgee (2452) - down the whirlpool, California, USA - NOV 8, 2009
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Draught. Hazy amber with a small white head. Sour fruity aroma with grape and light graininess. The flavor is lightly tart and planty in bitterness with some astringent grain husk. Fruity with more grape and grape-skin toward the end and an uncomfortably astringent bitterness in the finish. Messy and harsh with nothing good going for it. Iím generally not the biggest fan of SC Mountain beers, but this brings things to a whole new low and is just plain bad.
Papsoe (25131) - Frederiksberg, DENMARK - JUL 28, 2009
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
On tap. Slightly hazy amber with an off-white head. Very discreet caramel notes in the nose. Medium body, sweetish roasted malt and caramel. Hardly any bitterness. 090709
yespr (25930) - Copenhagen O, DENMARK - JUL 24, 2009
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
From tap at the brewpub. Pours almost clear and golden orange to amber with a small white head. Light toffeish aroma. Sweet caramel malty flavoured, vague butterish to the toffeish flavours. Ends roasted caramelish and sweet.
Ratman197 (7609) - Arvada, Colorado, USA - JUL 14, 2009
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bomber poured a clear reddish amber with a lasting amber head. Aromas of carmel, butterscotch, earthiness and fruiottiness. Palate was light bodied and crisp with a thin sharp finish. Flavors of carmel, butterscotch and a strange fruittiness with a crisp thin sharp finish. This is the second beer(Dread Brown) in a row Iíve had from this brewery thatís had weird flavor profiles.
Braudog (5025) - Hampton, Virginia, USA - JUL 9, 2009
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Draft at the brewery. OK, so hereís the deal with every beer I had here: buttery. Adjust the color and basic flavor component to match the beer otherwise, and that pretty much wraps it up. This had the overall character of caramel candy. (#3583, June 2009)