EricTheRed (82) - Plainfield, Illinois, USA - FEB 23, 2003
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
thin, tasteless, bubbly brew, reminded me of Miller Lite. not bad, but not my preference...i drank it at a japanese restaurant because it was the thing to do...when in rome, ya know.
dev (50) - Savannah, Missouri, USA - FEB 23, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Frothy white head. Very fine bubble carbonation.Perfumy, slightly sweet, slightly hoppy,watery flavor. Some salt taste.Very pale yellow color. Nice heavy can.This doesn't seem to taste the same as when I had it in the early eighties,seems more watered down. I really liked the small keg cans then, too.
pwyman (71) - Hubert, North Carolina, USA - FEB 21, 2003
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Golden Amber color, poured correctly to a small cream head. Mild taste that went well with Hibachi Dinner.
BeerPrince (1701) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - FEB 18, 2003
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Huge frothy head that laces nicely. Nose is basically nothing. I had to stick my honker in the foam to smell the skunky hops. Taste is faint with hints of hops and malt. Finish is flat and dry.
beerluvindave (194) - Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 17, 2003
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Ah.. the 2 liter can with it's own plastic handle and screw-on cap!!! Did I mention kareoke? Good taste, a bit sweet, but with old hop taste - similar to Heineken.
Bolo (12) - Ontario, CANADA - FEB 15, 2003
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
For some reason the "can" version sucks. Slighlty better taste than your average light beer but still very watery. I am not sure it was worth importing this all the way across the ocean. I can't think of a circumstance why I would buy it again.
Oakes (12633) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - FEB 12, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Occasionally, I would get the 2L cans when I was a student. I actually wrote quite detailed notes on it (take with grain of salt because they're five years old and more than once this beer has really sucked): soft body hidden beneath the mainstream carbonation, and a buttery, perfumy, fruity, hoppy character, with a grassier, maltier finish, with fruitiness in the end.
Yankovitch333 (612) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - FEB 3, 2003
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Tasted like something G. Heileman should brew. Very cheap tasting. It was also very watery. Way to expensive for what you get. You could buy a 6 pack of Pabst for what one of these cost and have the same damn thing.
mpbro (132) - Stanford, California, USA - FEB 2, 2003
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
This beer boasts a beautiful head. Thick, even, persistent, and attractively lacy. Aside from this, the beer is a "macro-swill". What hops? What malt? How do you spell rice? Not too bad with sushi; at least it was dry enough to keep my palate clean for the food.
LoveABeer (141) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - FEB 2, 2003
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Nice golden color, but from here its all down hill, watery and bland, bugger all flavour, one thing good about this was the size of the can.