mullet (849) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAR 24, 2004
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Not offensive, but has no flavour besides grass and metal. Slight haze too which is weird. No good.
caledonian (367) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - MAR 20, 2004
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Neat can. Pale straw color with a nice tall frothy white head. Initial skunky aroma. Kind of sweet. A bit weak on flavor.
unclebleen (620) - California, USA - MAR 20, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours a middle of the road amber color with a big , but quickly dissipating head. Aroma is sweet and organic...like fresh cut grass. Flavor is a lager through and through. Body is watery.
tiggmtl (4545) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAR 11, 2004
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Sweet and grassy aroma. Big white frothy head on golden blonde. Very active carbonation - lots o' little bubbles. Very dry simple flavour with a decent bitterness in the finish. Mouthfeel is a bit thin and slightly sticky which drastically lowers the score for me as I find it too sticky to be a warm weather refresher and not quite flavourful enough to be anything but. Can.
spkldhenlvr24 (517) - Newburgh/Buffalo, New York, USA - MAR 8, 2004
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
a nice golden color and medium white head. definately a overrall better beer than asahi. perfect with a japanese dinner. not too bad.
JCapriotti (1379) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 29, 2004
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Not bad looking... decent head, clear gold body. No real aroma though. Maybe the glass was inhibiting the nose. Served ice cold so hard to pick apart the flavor. But I'd hate to drink it warmer. Its taste wasn't as bad as Miller, but not good either. Was a bit watery, a little sweet. I'll have to try it with my meal next time.
DKlovesbeer (172) - Sarasota, Florida, USA - FEB 29, 2004
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Has a nice golden body with a white head that quickly fades. Aroma is fresh and smooth. Flavor is mostly sweet with a tad of bitterness in the finish. This beer is the perfect compliment to a good Japanese meal.
Gromit (479) - Port Orchard, Washington, USA - FEB 28, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
If this is their "Premium," I have *no* interest in anything else they make.
Pours a clear yellow with a thin white head that doesn't last very long. Minimal lacing. It goes downhill from here.
Smells like any other macro but just a touch sweeter.
Taste isn't quite as bad as most US macros, but it still sucks for a lager. And it's getting worse as it warms.
Mouthfeel is fuller than most macros but still not much. Drinkability only scores if my my choice is this or another macro.
Save your money.
becksgenius (110) - Illinois, USA - FEB 21, 2004
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
I probably should just cut and paste my response for all the japanese beers. clear light and fizzy. not much going on there are a lot better out there. but with japanese food its great.
beerhugger (542) - Oshawa, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 20, 2004
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
This was pretty bad but there are mitigating circumstances for the final score. I have to admit that while this beer accompanied my wonderful East Indian dinner feast it was not too bad. I also have memories of this being a refreshing beer I had in Japan out of a vending machine at the top of a lengthy mountain trail (sounds odd I realize....) Anyway, once the memory faded and the dinner was done it quickly went back to being a sub-standard watery lager. One of the classic examples of a really bad beer in a really cool bottle...err...can.