scoobyluv (511) - Asheville, North Carolina, USA - OCT 2, 2003
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
had this from a can. for some reason, maybe because it's foreign, i thought it would be spectacular. it wasn't. this is not even as good as a killians. more like a friggin' michelob. entirely unimpressive
JoeM500 (1907) - Crown Point, Indiana, USA - SEP 17, 2003
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Darft beer, but from a bottle....premium, even! This is less grainy than the "reserve", but lighter in body and confidence. Chug it with a burger, but don't expect a whole lot of flavor. Just slightly less adjuncty than it's American brothers.
TheBeerGod (5532) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - SEP 9, 2003
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: OCT 2, 2003 Had this tonight with dinner - sushi and sashimi at Matsu Sushi bar in VA Beach. Sure it pours yellow with a bland nose and a small white head, but this went exquisitely well with the food. Nearly tasteless body - malt with a slight metallic hint. Basically no aftertaste to speak of either. One of those things that seems to depend on something else. I'm not going to rate it high on that fact, because good beer should taste good anytime. However, this was decent enough to not get too poor a rating.
Braudog (5999) - Phoenix, Arizona, USA - SEP 8, 2003
2.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Got this from the can and it poured with a massive airy head, which quickly went away. The beer is light orange with a sweet malty aroma. The beer was flat on the tongue and the flavor was equally unexciting. Just another so-so beer, I'd say.
vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - SEP 5, 2003
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Has a light amber/golden color with some carbonation and a light malt smell. Taste is lightly malted and finishes a bit light. Overall it was your standard beer, better than the macros, but nothing special.
weusebio (69) - Portland, Oregon, USA - SEP 3, 2003
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Advertising says "Best Selling Japanese Beer" but that really means nothing to me, as Budweiser could be marketed as the same overseas. It's light, crisp, and easily forgettable.
brownaler (378) - Topsail Beach, North Carolina, USA - AUG 29, 2003
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Forms a large head and has a clear tan appearence. Has a taste of a American Standard with a cleaner and fuller flavor.
Uglyradio (791) - Greenville, South Carolina, USA - AUG 26, 2003
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
This one has a thin, fizzy white head that lingers a minute before dissipating, leaving a thin film of foam on the top. It has a clear, golden colored body with a faintly malty aroma that has a little bit of sweetness. It has a light body with high carbonation and a crisp mouthfeel. Flavor is malty and sweet up front with a clean, crisp finish that is refreshing. Not bad.
beastdog75 (363) - Brick, New Jersey, USA - AUG 20, 2003
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
I had the bottled "Premium Beer" version. Clean taste and aroma and kind of dry on the palette. There isn't a whole world of flavor here, but it is refreshing.
FtWorthBrew (105) - Fort Worth, Texas, USA - AUG 19, 2003
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
I drink it with sushi just for the experience. Sake is 100 times better. Sapporo is over priced mass produced imported water with a bit of added alcohol. Not suggested.