ferox (84) - Newcastle, ENGLAND - JUL 19, 2003
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Head is way too frothy. Palate is marked, but dissappears quickly. Also losses carbonation quickly. Poor flavour, like a poor mans Singha Gold.
bluevegie (3066) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - JUL 17, 2003
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Golden color with a good frothy head (didnt last long though) was what I poured into my glass, smelled the aroma of hops and then there wasnt much more,easy to drink but not my cup of tea er beer.
ericnixon (741) - Portland, Oregon, USA - JUL 16, 2003
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This is the first beer i've ever had out of a can in my life. nice can though. reminds me back when Volgon and i were kids we used to have a pretty big beer can collection. i have no idea what happened to it...i guess our parents threw them out. anyways...i digress. this beer had a pungent wafting aroma. i could almost smell the damaged rice/Bud-ness in this one. piss-yellow color. kinda fizzy and it just tastes yellow. is it horrible? no, not entirely. would i have it again? nope, not a chance.
djbuddha (90) - Many, Louisiana, USA - JUL 15, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Poured out an extremely light yellow with a large head. The aroma was good, but not great. Lots of carbonation, and goes down extremely smooth. This is an average beer, I don't think I'd buy it again unless I find it cheaper.
beermatrix (1497) - Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA - JUL 15, 2003
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Color is a pale clear yellow with a white head of foam that faded fast, leaving some smallish bubbly lacing. Smells faintly of sweetish malt and grain of bread or cornbread with barely a hop in the back. Taste is crisp and grainy with a slight sweet cornbread taste thats smooth and easy. There's a little hop in the back, but hardly noticeable unless a big swig is taken from your glass. This is a OK drinker, nothing outstanding, a bit airy and watery, thinned out and could use some body and flavor.
WabashMan (1017) - Noblesville, Indiana, USA - JUL 13, 2003
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Assuming this is the correct beer, since mine's in a most interesting can, I have to start off by saying the look of the beer is better than I expected, with a large white head and pale/medium golden color. Nose is fairly light and a little bitter. Not much here, though. The flavor is a little earthy and pretty watery. Again, not much to comment on...
surfahoy (1) - USA - JUL 11, 2003 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Since taste is a subjective affair, here's my opinion. Simply the best! Beats all after a surf session, or with any kind of food (ok, Singha maybe better with Thai ordered extra hot)!
Cashazza (217) - Morganville, Maryland, USA - JUL 2, 2003
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: JUL 7, 2003 Good summer beer; yellow lager, lots of carbonation, head quickly dissipates, weak flavor -- though pleasant -- watery, faintly hoppy, and very sweet. Could definitely use some more umph.
TChrome (1447) - Bedford, Texas, USA - JUL 2, 2003
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Rather bland but drinkable Japanese brew. Aroma is lightly hoppy with a bit of hay aroma. Beer pours yellow, though not fizzy with a moderate head that is retained. Flavor is light hops and maybe just a tiny bit skunky. OK.
bob32256 (171) - Jacksonville, Florida, USA - JUL 2, 2003
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Nice color, but that's where it ends; the taste resembles Heineken, but it is only a faint resemblance - there's a really bad aftertaste