cheapdark (2016), Monacatootha, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Apr 7, 2007 Updated: Apr 8, 2007I rate this as I drink, not a memory. First let me say there is nothing like an ice cold can of Schaefer for $1 at the State Line in East Palestine. The State Line is one of those places that ratebeer would not allow you to enter. You pop the lid of this 12 oz can and you get a slightly sour aroma. First sip is a bit rude but that immediately fades to an acceptable ubiquitous beer flavor that is common in the US. The taste is very clean. I can remember when I drank Schaefer before it was bought by a BMC. It has about the same flavor so I assume they are still using the same recipe. While watching a few bikers and their women shoot pool I noticed this is a clean brew, not offensive in the presentation. Not bitter, a typical american beer with friendly gentleman behaviors and manners. It actually deserves more than an average overall rating considering all the happy Schaefers I’ve drank in the fast. I agree with JAF737300, it’s a good brew. faroeviking (6024), Republica Vikingo de las, Faroe Islands
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Mar 15, 2007 Now that is really a nasty brew....beer....or "beer"...it really can not be called beer for sure as there is not enough malt in it for that! Dirt cheap though. Weak yellowish colour, metallic aroma, no head what so ever, flat cheap flavour with a hint of some metal and something uncomfortable. Best when really cooled! Nasty, nastier, nastiest.......Schaefer. josuemucho (86), Orlando, Florida, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Mar 12, 2007 Embarassed to have tried this. Gold color. No aroma. I tasted expired meat. Not recommended to anyone for any reason. Production should be stopped keepersj12 (790), Sicklerville, New Jersey, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Feb 16, 2007 An old throwback. This stuff used to be good like Piels was way back when. Now just slop. What does" The one beer to have when your having more than one" mean anyway. JAF737300 (792), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Feb 5, 2007 A lot of folks have beat this beer up. Yes, it is a throwback to our grandfathers days but poeple liked this stuff for a reason. It was easy to drink and you did not have to think about it....you just had a beer. MadIndian (992), Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Jan 9, 2007 Sampled from a plastic cup (I didn’t want to ruin my Ayinger glassware) Was in the single bin and I had to try it. This body, watery taste. Not much to write about. DHeubs (9), Yonkers, New York, USA does not count | 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 | Jan 5, 2007 Hey, it’s budget beer. I think it’s pretty decent and it doesn’t try to be anything more. It’s smooth and easy to drink, nothing special. mansquito (824), Boston/Philadelphia, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Dec 28, 2006 This beer has no taste. It has no smell either. It is also useless. I don’t know why I drank it. Oh yeah, I actually remember now... I was stupid. Oh... and it was cheap... actually it was a dollar more than the other stuff. Oh and it also has a meager 4.4 percent alcohol. No reason to drink it, except to drink it.
|