ads135 (2330) - Lawrence, Kansas, USA - NOV 24, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Not a bad lager. Mildly sweet with a light body and surprisingly substantive mouthfeel.
esoxangler (87) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 4, 2012
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Just a really average beer that i find refreshing while basking in the sun in northern Minnesota. Not great, but good. grainy and a little malty and hoppy, thats it. slightly sweet, slightly bitter, pretty well balanced. Miss Walleye and sunfish always treat me well
jmohno (963) - Iowa, USA - SEP 30, 2012
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Clear yellow/gold.Half inch head with frothy decending lacing.Well carbed.
Aroma is sweet grain,corn maybe, slight noble grassy/floral.Very slight carmel/butter.Pretty good light aroma for a pale lager.
Taste is fairly creamy with light carmel/butter notes,medium body,mellow sweet grain,corn and mineral notes. Pretty good alltogether taste.
Nice mellow smooth finish slight citrus/raw plantygrassyness sorta pepper like in bittering. Smooth and mellow taste.
Pretty good sessionable pale lager.I havent had any average/below average beers from Schell,pretty good beers in my opinion.
doubelknv3 (911) - Illinois, USA - SEP 29, 2012
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Mild grain aroma. Golden with white head. Mild grain and lemon hop flavors. Watery, but balanced.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
BillKismet (3163) - Seattle, Washington, USA - SEP 29, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Blonde gold body, with a dank beer-sopped bar aroma swiftly smashing the nose. A slight hint of garbage. The body is fairly breezy with some hop bitterness. Thinnish moutfhfeel. A spritz of sulfur on the finish.
conciergeman (73) - Minnesota, USA - AUG 5, 2011
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz bottle to pint glass. Pours nice golden color, with very slight aroma. Skimps even more on the taste, I found it to be very plain and almost "macro-light" tasting. Great labels, and historic brewery, but just a plain beer maybe o.k. for a steaming hot summer day.
SphinxTX (2875) - Mata Gorda, Texas, USA - JUL 19, 2011
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
12 oz bottle. Pours a clear gold with white head. Aroma of malt, light grain and balanced hop. Flavor is much the same. Light body with high carbonation. Overall, not a bad pale lager at all! Enjoyed.
wlajwl (3321) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - MAR 20, 2011
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Slight crisp hoppiness to it, other than that the same old pale lager that’s been made numerous times.
crossovert (5627) - Illinois, USA - FEB 10, 2011
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Just a stupidly branded adjunct lager. Teh taste is of corn and mineral water.
dekester1 (285) - Neenah, Wisconsin, USA - SEP 11, 2010
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Poured a semi-dark gold with a light head which faded quickly to lace. Aroma was slightly sweet with malts and corn predominating. Taste of similar - malt and corn - with a slightly sweet hint and a very mild hop finish. Mouth feel was acceptable. Overall, not a bad ’fishing’ brew, as it is marketed as. I could potential re-purchase as ’lawnmower’ or ’fishing’ beer but that would be about it.