pjcoupe (105) - Perryton, Texas, USA - DEC 7, 2004
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Nice copper color fruity aroma nice hoppy flavor that is pretty overpowering little darker roasred flavor than I have I have come to appreciate. Similar to Sam Adams flavor in a bottle,might be killer on draft.
ads135 (3279) - Lawrence, Kansas, USA - NOV 21, 2013
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Tried this at the brewery on my way through New Ulm. A decent pale ale. Bready and light with some floral hop crispness.
dlbeer (845) - Wisconsin, USA - SEP 9, 2012
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottle. Yellow pour. Not much head but a lot of lacing. Slight hoppy smell. Floral hop taste that does not linger very long. Above average carbonation. Very decent beer.
crossovert (8633) - Illinois, USA - MAR 6, 2011
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Generic, bland, better than Sam Adams though. Biscuit with a touch of hops. Boring.
rings (54) - Michigan, USA - FEB 14, 2011
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I decided to give their Pale Ale a try.
While itís supposedly "steeped in German heritage"--which seems a bit odd for an English style--it can definitely be described as an American pale ale. It has more body than I expected and an East Kent Golding dry finish, which is rather pronounced. While perhaps a little thinner than most locally brewed versions, itís actually not too bad--in fact, itís surprisingly tasty--and fair representation of the style.
Iím curious to try a few more of their efforts.
Serving type: bottle
wlajwl (4318) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - FEB 1, 2011
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Not among the best, but for its dry hoppiness and decent maltiness, its not that bad.
arminjewell (7999) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - DEC 19, 2010
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours hazy orange with white head, aroma of some floral and grass, touch of sweet citrus. Taste is some citrus, grassy middle with some caramel, and a relatively sweet finish. Not a bad pale ale!
zeke626 (439) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - OCT 16, 2010
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottle, pours a clear orange-gold body with off-white head. Perfumey aroma of citrus, grass, and floral hops with an undertone of sweet malts. Flavor is similar, with a light bitterness throughout the palate. Smooth mouthfeel; nicely carbonated. Finishes dry with a hop bitterness. Not bad - solid and very sessionable.
bpreo (1917) - Eugene, Oregon, USA - OCT 12, 2010
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: OCT 16, 2010 One more from the sampler pack. Pale Ale was fairly normal, nothing wrong with that.
Nsanders (661) - St Paul, Minnesota, USA - OCT 10, 2010
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Amber in color. Active, small bubbles. Hoppy, floral/pine-like aroma. Bitterness is moderate.
vomit (186) - Michigan, USA - JUL 22, 2010
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Of the pale ales Iíve tried, I can certainly say this: "Itís a Pale ale". Keep your wits about you and when youíre at the store looking for some tasty brew and you spy this, just KEEP ON WALKING.....right to the section that has Blatz. Then laugh as you buy a case of Godís sweetest nectar for what you would have (over) paid for a six pack of this tripe. Donít question it!