Gabemik (46), Joplin, Missouri, USA May 26, 2007 A good choice as a gateway beer. A more flavorfull version of the american football beer. The 1904 version (not listed) has a little more hop flavor to it then the standard. mad_scotsman (147), Fairview Heights, Illinois, USA Feb 18, 2007 Nothing special here besides it tasting a little better than the mass-marketed lager from the St. Louis area. Cornfield (4254), Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA Jul 30, 2006 More drinkable than most that fall under our "pale lager" category, this looks like the rest, yellow with a skinny fizzy head. The aroma is a sweet with corn and a faint grassy bitterness. The flavor’s much the same, although having a more noticeable bitterness than most in this style. Abrupt finish.
<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp?PlaceID=5585>Friar Tuck Wines, Sprirts, & Beverages, Bloomington, IL<font size=-1>
segfault (74), Centennial, Colorado, USA Jun 12, 2006 Updated: Sep 11, 2006Pale golden clear pour, sudsy head that rapidly dissipates. Aroma is corn, grass, and sweet. The palate is smooth and rounded, but still light as to the style. Flavor has a sweetness on the front of the tongue, woody, grassy taste and corn, turning drier on the back of the tongue, and finally, before dissappearing altogether there is a hint that some bittering hops might be in this beer, but they show as pepper. For an American light Lager, I guess its pretty good, although I’m not a big fan of the style. Thanks, alaskanwarren! KUEric (551), Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA Jun 6, 2006 12 oz Bottle: Pours a very light and opaque yellowy gold with little to no head that turns into little lily pads of foam. Aroma is a little peppery, spices, pilsner aroma. The flavor is very pilsner urquell-esque. a biting mouthfeel of carbonatioin and not a ton of flavor, but it is nice.
|