njager246 (604) - grand rapids, Michigan, USA - NOV 16, 2013
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is a cheap beer, simple not much to it................................
blackisle (1224) - IJburg, NETHERLANDS - NOV 14, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Clear pale golden, frothy white head, vanishes quickly, no lacing; malty nose, corn, herbal hops; light sweet, slightly bitter; medium body, sticky texture, average carbonation; crisp medium bitter finish.
CharmCityCrab (211) - Maryland, USA - OCT 22, 2013
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Basic adjunct lager with a bit of extra malt and grain in the bill. Not a great beer, but a good buy. A little cheaper than your BMC and little more taste. It’s not going to blow anyone away, but based on it’s reputation, you’d think it was undrinkable. It’s not undrinkable. Busch is undrinkable. Schlitz is fine if you’re on a budget or want a pale adjunct lager. Must have changed things up from the days when the brand got ruined back in the day.
rumproasts (4189) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - OCT 9, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
tap. golden with small head. tastes like an old-school lager. decent amount of mild malt. for what it is, this isn’t bad at all.
bartlebier (2668) - Belchium im Biersgau, GERMANY - OCT 8, 2013
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Draught at Billy Goat Tavern, Chicago Sep2013. Bit of an Abv nose on a watery pale lage brewed down to virtual taste extinction. Glad I was offered a free sample first.
tnkw01 (1361) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JUL 22, 2013
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. Revived formula. Taste is the old timey lager taste from years ago. Aroma is hay, straw and weak. Appearance is golden with a good head.
ccex (1081) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JUL 3, 2013
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
16 oz can proclaims "classic ’60s formula", implying that the quality was worse or less popular in recent decades. Pours a clear pale yellow with a quickly disappearing fizzy white head and a little lacing. Aroma is grains, corn, a bit of cardboard and the faintest of hops - it tries to be inoffensive. Taste is slightly sweet but hardly noticeable. Body is light with noticeable carbonation. This was the first beer I ever tried back in high school when the jazz band director wanted to get drunk with his students. I’m not sure if it’s any better than my first revolting taste of it, but it still serves its purpose.
csaso (1724) - Missouri, USA - MAY 29, 2013
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Tap - small foamy head, pale straw color, pretty typical pale lager aroma and flavor, maybe slightly more flavor than the average
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
ajnepple (3564) - Conifer, Colorado, USA - MAY 27, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: MAY 30, 2013 On tap at the unnamed arcade bar in Fort Collins. Pale, golden and clear with a small white head. The aroma and flavor is sweet malts and corn. Light body with a thin soft feel and a sweet finish. Not nearly as bad as I thought it would be.
robobeerbelly (73) - Wisconsin, USA - APR 9, 2013
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
this is one of a few beers that is served on dollar crappy beer night at bars in my area. it’s not a very smooth beer and it leaves a bad after taste.