odannyob (83) - Colorado, USA - JUN 28, 2008
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: JUN 29, 2013 Well, it was either a Coors, a Bud, a Miller, a Pabst , a Hamms or, this one that still tastes like Schlitz, back then where there were these beers.
And we had sayings or rhymes that went with each, like, 2 Coors for 2 whores or Schlitz will give ya the shits; ya know, kinda stuff like that. Iím on my 3rd Schlitz now and so far, easy on it.
I keep athinkiní "this is a brew that has a historic depth of taste to it" flavor. A beer that was drank without judgement other than enjoying it.
rdixon77 (1188) - Georgia, USA - MAR 29, 2015
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Going through old beers With nostalgia this morning. Pretty much bad even for bad beer standards. Piss and cardboard.
kaser (3582) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAR 29, 2015
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bright yellow pour from draft at Baumgartner in Monroe, WI. White creamy head. Fruit and wheat aroma. Balanced lager. Expected it to be gross and it wasn't. Had it before a bunch of times but forgot about it
Driverdrummer (1) - - JAN 11, 2015 does not count
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 7/20
This was recently brought back to South Carolina with the "Classic 60s Formula" tag removed. Was the recipe changed again???tastes of sugary malt, corn, and barley. It does not taste like the great beer I had 2 years ago which was Schlitz Gusto.
strap (520) - Seoul, SOUTH KOREA - NOV 21, 2014
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Chugged a pound of this testing beers for the beer mile. Nothing redeeming about this swill
slowrunner77 (6336) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 15, 2014
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
"pee water all the way here. had it in a can, so no skunk, but GAWD is it horrible. Again, why bother...thereís gotta be better ways to get a buzz, right? gotta be..."
Travlr (14471) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - AUG 22, 2014
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is what I drank as a teenager in New York when I didnít know better, couldnít afford anything else, and didnít have much choice. Typical boring lager.
hopdog (9461) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 21, 2014
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
12oz bottle. Poured a golden color with a small sized head. Yep, itís a Schlitz!
TXBadger (1705) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JUN 27, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Again, drank a lot of this in college before developing a real palate. Gold pour with skunked grains on the nose and palate.
alexsdad06 (6433) - Ohio, USA - JUN 26, 2014
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle from old backlog notes 07. Pours a clear pale yellow color with a medium sized white head. Typical sweet grainy, corn, light grassy aroma of macro pale lagers. Moving on.
onceblind (4965) - Denver, Colorado, USA - MAY 28, 2014
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Page crystal golden with a bubbly head like cola. Inoffensive pale malt aroma. Inoffensive pale malt and light wheat flavour. Dry, sorta refreshing, very light bitterness. I feared it would be worse, however this is actually ok. Better than BMC, for sure.