molsonracing86 (13) - Fremont, New Hampshire, USA - AUG 23, 2007
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
This stuff actually tasted good, smooth, and sweet for 5 or 6 cans, and then the "hops" strange as it may sound, turned into a pukey-burnt sort of flavor. And that wierd fact alone causes the bad rating. even though this is billed as the beer that made Milwaukee famous, I have heard citizens of Milwaukee proper preferred PBR over the Schlitz in a big way. I can see why.PBR is definitely the better old MIL cheap-ass Macro.
slowrunner77 (5975) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 15, 2014
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
"pee water all the way here. had it in a can, so no skunk, but GAWD is it horrible. Again, why bother...there’s gotta be better ways to get a buzz, right? gotta be..."
Travlr (12286) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - AUG 22, 2014
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is what I drank as a teenager in New York when I didn’t know better, couldn’t afford anything else, and didn’t have much choice. Typical boring lager.
hopdog (9018) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 21, 2014
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
12oz bottle. Poured a golden color with a small sized head. Yep, it’s a Schlitz!
TXBadger (1421) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JUN 27, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Again, drank a lot of this in college before developing a real palate. Gold pour with skunked grains on the nose and palate.
alexsdad06 (5562) - Ohio, USA - JUN 26, 2014
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle from old backlog notes 07. Pours a clear pale yellow color with a medium sized white head. Typical sweet grainy, corn, light grassy aroma of macro pale lagers. Moving on.
onceblind (4287) - Denver, Colorado, USA - MAY 28, 2014
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Page crystal golden with a bubbly head like cola. Inoffensive pale malt aroma. Inoffensive pale malt and light wheat flavour. Dry, sorta refreshing, very light bitterness. I feared it would be worse, however this is actually ok. Better than BMC, for sure.
bwa5879 (685) - Portage, Michigan, USA - MAY 12, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Clearish goldn pour, small bright white head. Sour rubbery lager yeast aroma, hint of citrus rind and cream. Average carbonation, thinner but bubbly mouthfeel, dry finish. Taste is grainy and every so slightly sweet, no detectable bitter. Easy tasting decent american lager.
Headbanger (3325) - Aurora, Illinois, USA - APR 16, 2014
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz bottle (Old Notes)-Pours golden with a small white head. Aroma of corn, grains, and malt. Taste of grains and malt. This light bodied brew was the thing in the past.
solidfunk (4168) - Washington D.C., Washington DC, USA - MAR 29, 2014
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Had a taste of this at the bar last night - someone was joking about craft beer connoisseur-ship. As I said then, papery taste of garbage with some piss. Yum.
Daverappster (10) - - MAR 4, 2014
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Ever since they brought back the original recipe from the 1960’s I will drink it on occassion. Decent tasting beer. Not the best I’ve had but not the worst. Worth drinking.