molsonracing86 (13) - Fremont, New Hampshire, USA - AUG 23, 2007
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
This stuff actually tasted good, smooth, and sweet for 5 or 6 cans, and then the "hops" strange as it may sound, turned into a pukey-burnt sort of flavor. And that wierd fact alone causes the bad rating. even though this is billed as the beer that made Milwaukee famous, I have heard citizens of Milwaukee proper preferred PBR over the Schlitz in a big way. I can see why.PBR is definitely the better old MIL cheap-ass Macro.
tony2335 (1) - Illinois, USA - DEC 24, 2015 does not count
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is a real old fashioned great beer It wasnít No 1 back in the 60ís for nothing!!
Bacterial (2674) - Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA - NOV 24, 2015
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can sent to me as a joke, but Iím actually quite glad I got to try this! Pours clear light yellow with a lot of white foam that quickly disappears. Corny taste. Slightly earthy hop nose with a hint of butter in the nose. Metallic finish.
Block (2073) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - AUG 27, 2015
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
I had this one in New Orleans. Itís a light beer and I thought it was kind of a joke. Itís bad.
rdixon77 (1973) - Georgia, USA - MAR 29, 2015
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Going through old beers With nostalgia this morning. Pretty much bad even for bad beer standards. Piss and cardboard.
kaser (5112) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAR 29, 2015
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bright yellow pour from draft at Baumgartner in Monroe, WI. White creamy head. Fruit and wheat aroma. Balanced lager. Expected it to be gross and it wasn't. Had it before a bunch of times but forgot about it
Driverdrummer (1) - - JAN 11, 2015 does not count
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 7/20
This was recently brought back to South Carolina with the "Classic 60s Formula" tag removed. Was the recipe changed again???tastes of sugary malt, corn, and barley. It does not taste like the great beer I had 2 years ago which was Schlitz Gusto.
strap (691) - Sindelfingen, Baden-WŁrttemberg, GERMANY - NOV 21, 2014
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Chugged a pound of this testing beers for the beer mile. Nothing redeeming about this swill
slowrunner77 (8994) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 15, 2014
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
"pee water all the way here. had it in a can, so no skunk, but GAWD is it horrible. Again, why bother...thereís gotta be better ways to get a buzz, right? gotta be..."
Travlr (19528) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - AUG 22, 2014
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is what I drank as a teenager in New York when I didnít know better, couldnít afford anything else, and didnít have much choice. Typical boring lager.
hopdog (10731) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 21, 2014
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
12oz bottle. Poured a golden color with a small sized head. Yep, itís a Schlitz!