hogan873 (451) - Joliet, Illinois, USA - JUN 27, 2009
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Meh. Not a bad beer, but absolutely nothing exciting. Thereís a hint of skunk in the aroma and a slightly bitter metallic aftertaste that kept me from giving it a higher rating. I viewed it for what it is and didnít compare it to other brews. Fairly refreshing and a decent thirst quencher on a hot day. But thatís about it.
BeerRenter76 (719) - Texas, USA - JUL 15, 2016
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Originally rated on 9/19/08. Pretty average american macro, comparable to the buds, coors and millers of the world. Flavor of corn, a little malt and hops. Not the worst thing out there.
dug_nichols (1) - Another Blank, Virginia, USA - MAY 28, 2016 does not count
4.7 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
This is the rebound of an ancient 60ís Classic. Gone is the ABM method that tanked this monolithic brew in the 80ís and 90ís. This brand has been re-re-born promising to echo yesterday-years greatness by embracing those Druidic incantations and magical utterances used prior to the greedy catastrophe. Not found in Virginia - yet - but soon...soon...soon
tony2335 (1) - Illinois, USA - DEC 24, 2015 does not count
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is a real old fashioned great beer It wasnít No 1 back in the 60ís for nothing!!
Bacterial (2775) - Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA - NOV 24, 2015
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can sent to me as a joke, but Iím actually quite glad I got to try this! Pours clear light yellow with a lot of white foam that quickly disappears. Corny taste. Slightly earthy hop nose with a hint of butter in the nose. Metallic finish.
Block (2165) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - AUG 27, 2015
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
I had this one in New Orleans. Itís a light beer and I thought it was kind of a joke. Itís bad.
rdixon77 (2247) - Georgia, USA - MAR 29, 2015
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Going through old beers With nostalgia this morning. Pretty much bad even for bad beer standards. Piss and cardboard.
kaser (5502) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAR 29, 2015
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bright yellow pour from draft at Baumgartner in Monroe, WI. White creamy head. Fruit and wheat aroma. Balanced lager. Expected it to be gross and it wasn't. Had it before a bunch of times but forgot about it
Driverdrummer (1) - - JAN 11, 2015 does not count
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 7/20
This was recently brought back to South Carolina with the "Classic 60s Formula" tag removed. Was the recipe changed again???tastes of sugary malt, corn, and barley. It does not taste like the great beer I had 2 years ago which was Schlitz Gusto.
strap (721) - Sindelfingen, Baden-WŁrttemberg, GERMANY - NOV 21, 2014
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Chugged a pound of this testing beers for the beer mile. Nothing redeeming about this swill
slowrunner77 (9620) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 15, 2014
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
"pee water all the way here. had it in a can, so no skunk, but GAWD is it horrible. Again, why bother...thereís gotta be better ways to get a buzz, right? gotta be..."