hogan873 (449) - Joliet, Illinois, USA - JUN 27, 2009
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Meh. Not a bad beer, but absolutely nothing exciting. There’s a hint of skunk in the aroma and a slightly bitter metallic aftertaste that kept me from giving it a higher rating. I viewed it for what it is and didn’t compare it to other brews. Fairly refreshing and a decent thirst quencher on a hot day. But that’s about it.
rdixon77 (1540) - Georgia, USA - MAR 29, 2015
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Going through old beers With nostalgia this morning. Pretty much bad even for bad beer standards. Piss and cardboard.
kaser (4005) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - MAR 29, 2015
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bright yellow pour from draft at Baumgartner in Monroe, WI. White creamy head. Fruit and wheat aroma. Balanced lager. Expected it to be gross and it wasn't. Had it before a bunch of times but forgot about it
Driverdrummer (1) - - JAN 11, 2015 does not count
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 7/20
This was recently brought back to South Carolina with the "Classic 60s Formula" tag removed. Was the recipe changed again???tastes of sugary malt, corn, and barley. It does not taste like the great beer I had 2 years ago which was Schlitz Gusto.
strap (566) - Seoul, SOUTH KOREA - NOV 21, 2014
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Chugged a pound of this testing beers for the beer mile. Nothing redeeming about this swill
slowrunner77 (6925) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 15, 2014
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
"pee water all the way here. had it in a can, so no skunk, but GAWD is it horrible. Again, why bother...there’s gotta be better ways to get a buzz, right? gotta be..."
Travlr (15646) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - AUG 22, 2014
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is what I drank as a teenager in New York when I didn’t know better, couldn’t afford anything else, and didn’t have much choice. Typical boring lager.
hopdog (9742) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 21, 2014
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
12oz bottle. Poured a golden color with a small sized head. Yep, it’s a Schlitz!
TXBadger (1890) - Dallas, Texas, USA - JUN 27, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Again, drank a lot of this in college before developing a real palate. Gold pour with skunked grains on the nose and palate.
alexsdad06 (6881) - Ohio, USA - JUN 26, 2014
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle from old backlog notes 07. Pours a clear pale yellow color with a medium sized white head. Typical sweet grainy, corn, light grassy aroma of macro pale lagers. Moving on.
onceblind (5313) - Denver, Colorado, USA - MAY 28, 2014
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Page crystal golden with a bubbly head like cola. Inoffensive pale malt aroma. Inoffensive pale malt and light wheat flavour. Dry, sorta refreshing, very light bitterness. I feared it would be worse, however this is actually ok. Better than BMC, for sure.