TheBeerCollector (633) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - JAN 1, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Nothing special here. Gold in color with a decent head. Aroma of straw and wheat. Flavor is watery, bland and metallic. Has a fizzy bitterness that is not appealing.
envane (569) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - FEB 22, 2004
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 7/20
Gold colour. A bit maltier than other eurolagers, but still a eurolager. They must be joking if they expect me to write 75 characters on something like this.
Falconseye8 (542) - Evans, Colorado, USA - OCT 29, 2003
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Huge billoughy white head. Very Watery. One could power a bunch of these. I won't slam since we're so close to the stupendous event. I won't glorify it either. There's better out there.
TheRimmer (483) - Florida, USA - SEP 16, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
what the hell is this. it tastes like bottled water mixed with some dirt. maybe if they had a gimmick this would be better. say a scorpion at the bottom of each bottle like mescal tequila worms. unredeemable.
kumite56 (473) - Cordova, Tennessee, USA - DEC 28, 2003
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Not a good beer. From the first wiff of an aroma it was clear this was going to be underwelming and adjunct laced. I think it must have lots of corn due to sweet tastte and poor quality. pass on this beer.
SkyinBrian (430) - Saint Louis, Missouri, USA - JUL 5, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
past the best by date for sure, but still tasted ok, although slight hints of cardboard came through, but this was still refreshing. mild carbonation for a pale lager, but the bottle says premium later. not much going on though. easily forgettable probably deserving of its low ratings.
futre7 (211) - Taipei, TAIWAN - JUL 27, 2012
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Crisp and clean. Light malts with a watery mouthfeel. It is pale lager and it tastes like a pale lager. Better than the average affair in UK pubs. Very good in the summer and thirst quenching. I am not even sure it is available outside the north east of England and frankly my mates who still live there question if it is still made ( this was a memory review heh) .
savitska (163) - Smyrna, Georgia, USA - JAN 12, 2004
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Another yellow, yeasty lager from the UK. A very nice head and a decent aroma, but a very mild flavor. Not much in the way of a malt or a hop character. A beer for rental, not for purchase.
mik82 (34) - ENGLAND - DEC 6, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Can’t believe I found this on here. Not going to be a very useful rating as I drank most of these warm or through a bottle-bong when i was 17. Can’t remember it tasting of much but it was very cheap.
jimzombie27 (1) - West Midlands, ENGLAND - MAR 14, 2005 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
First time around the aftertaste isn’t all that great. After you’ve got past the first can though you’ll be hooked.