2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20 alcaponejunior (350) - Texas, USA - DEC 28, 2012
Well looks wise it ain’t much, clear, yellow and fizzy with a small head that dissipated quickly and left not much lacing.
Aroma is kind of sweet, smell more like an adjunct lager brewed with corn than a pure malt brew. A bit of honey and some grains too.
Taste isn’t quite as sweet as the aroma led me to believe it would be, but it’s still somewhat sweet. It’s got a nice graininess and a little grassy flavor too. There’s a light bitterness that provides some balance, but nothing notable as being hops.
Body is very light, fizzy, and quite easy to drink.
It’s a good lawnmower beer, or a substitute for AALs. It’s not much to write home about though.
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 Shag (2443) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - DEC 25, 2012
A golden color with a white head. The aroma contains some lemons and corn mostly. The flavor doesn’t contain much of anything really with some lemon and slight grassy notes. Would be ok in the place of BMC swill but thats about all the props I can give.
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 Caytinator (577) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - DEC 24, 2012
12oz bottle. Small persistent head, clean pour, clear "blonde" color, laces ok. Aroma is cereals and slightly yeasty. Taste is light, pretty clean, but nothing interesting here. Slight aftertaste. It’s slightly sub-par, it might be OK with food (barbecue). It’s closer to a pale lager than a true pilsener.
1.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20 Imaena (848) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - DEC 19, 2012
Bottle. Watery, overly tart, and uninteresting. I would avoid this unless your other options are even worse pale lagers.
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20 TomTron (296) - Aiken, South Carolina, USA - DEC 18, 2012
Pours a clear golden yellow with little to no head. Aromas of yeast and grass. I’d say this i a decent pilsener from a mi(a)cro brewery and its better than the rest of the macros out there, but it’s still nothing special.
1.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20 sirkerry (1) - Katy, Texas, USA - DEC 18, 2012 does not count
citrus, golden, medium bitterness, light body, average carbonation, bitter, better than some of the mass market beers I’ve had in the past, but not one I’d care to have again.
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20 dbarnold (1073) - Bethesda, Maryland, USA - DEC 17, 2012
Beer sucks, it’s sweet, without much taste, fizzy and overall boring. Shouldn’t be called blond if it’s a pils, cause the yeast definitely doesn’t work.
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20 beastmaster (90) - Florida, USA - DEC 14, 2012
I’m from Texas so im biased. Light, no head. Still, better then your typical nascar beer.
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 DCLawyer (687) - Falls Church, Virginia, USA - DEC 12, 2012
Bottle->SA glass. Pale yellow, slight head that quickly dissipates. Aroma of light malt. Taste has mild hops. Crisp and refreshing, but ultimately dull.
2.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20 airrick2003 (174) - Louisiana, USA - DEC 11, 2012
Aroma: light hop smell
Appearance:clear golden color, clear ish small head fades very fast
Taste: buttery and creamy flavor, good beer
Palate: very smooth, no aftertaste
Overall: this beer is pretty good, buttery and smooth
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
|