alcaponejunior (350) - Texas, USA - DEC 28, 2012
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
Well looks wise it ainít much, clear, yellow and fizzy with a small head that dissipated quickly and left not much lacing.
Aroma is kind of sweet, smell more like an adjunct lager brewed with corn than a pure malt brew. A bit of honey and some grains too.
Taste isnít quite as sweet as the aroma led me to believe it would be, but itís still somewhat sweet. Itís got a nice graininess and a little grassy flavor too. Thereís a light bitterness that provides some balance, but nothing notable as being hops.
Body is very light, fizzy, and quite easy to drink.
Itís a good lawnmower beer, or a substitute for AALs. Itís not much to write home about though.
Shag (2443) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - DEC 25, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A golden color with a white head. The aroma contains some lemons and corn mostly. The flavor doesnít contain much of anything really with some lemon and slight grassy notes. Would be ok in the place of BMC swill but thats about all the props I can give.
Caytinator (577) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - DEC 24, 2012
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz bottle. Small persistent head, clean pour, clear "blonde" color, laces ok. Aroma is cereals and slightly yeasty. Taste is light, pretty clean, but nothing interesting here. Slight aftertaste. Itís slightly sub-par, it might be OK with food (barbecue). Itís closer to a pale lager than a true pilsener.
Imaena (848) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - DEC 19, 2012
1.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle. Watery, overly tart, and uninteresting. I would avoid this unless your other options are even worse pale lagers.
TomTron (296) - Aiken, South Carolina, USA - DEC 18, 2012
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours a clear golden yellow with little to no head. Aromas of yeast and grass. Iíd say this i a decent pilsener from a mi(a)cro brewery and its better than the rest of the macros out there, but itís still nothing special.
sirkerry (1) - Katy, Texas, USA - DEC 18, 2012 does not count
1.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
citrus, golden, medium bitterness, light body, average carbonation, bitter, better than some of the mass market beers Iíve had in the past, but not one Iíd care to have again.
dbarnold (1073) - Bethesda, Maryland, USA - DEC 17, 2012
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Beer sucks, itís sweet, without much taste, fizzy and overall boring. Shouldnít be called blond if itís a pils, cause the yeast definitely doesnít work.
beastmaster (90) - Florida, USA - DEC 14, 2012
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Iím from Texas so im biased. Light, no head. Still, better then your typical nascar beer.
DCLawyer (687) - Falls Church, Virginia, USA - DEC 12, 2012
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bottle->SA glass. Pale yellow, slight head that quickly dissipates. Aroma of light malt. Taste has mild hops. Crisp and refreshing, but ultimately dull.
airrick2003 (174) - Louisiana, USA - DEC 11, 2012
2.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Aroma: light hop smell
Appearance:clear golden color, clear ish small head fades very fast
Taste: buttery and creamy flavor, good beer
Palate: very smooth, no aftertaste
Overall: this beer is pretty good, buttery and smooth
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone