robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - DEC 1, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Light Gold Coloring. Not My Style So Hard to Be Merciful On This One. Lightly Bitter...And Sweet Right in the Beginning. Some Grain and Hops.. Not Terribly Horrible...But Trying to Be.
KAggie97 (3529) - Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA - OCT 31, 2004
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
If Shiner doesn’t watch out, it will gain a reputation as an overpriced version of your choice of mass brewers. This stuff, while slightly better than the aforementioned, is still overpriced for what you get. If you’re gonna fork over $7 for a six pack, get a REAL German lager, not a pale immitation. Pun intended.
wildchefbill (245) - Sarasota, Florida, USA - OCT 20, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pours clear pale gold with a nice white head. Aroma is weak malt. Starts sweet with a lame attempt at hop bitterness. Clean and crisp, but so is cold water. Thin body with heavy carbonation. Not bad, but not great.
darkstar (69) - Eureka, Missouri, USA - OCT 20, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Yellow collar. Nice head. The flavor was nonexistant. I can’t believe I payed 7 dollars for a six pack of this stuff. It was almost exactly like budweiser. Very disappointing. Sorry I didn’t read the reviews on here before I bought it.
thegreenrooster (3364) - St.louis, Missouri, USA - SEP 19, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pours is a very clear yellow with a fizzy head. No real aroma and the flavor is dull and flat. You get some hops and malts in there but again very dull and flat. Not great but better than bud and cheaper too.
Pigfoot (2268) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - SEP 19, 2004
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Appearance: utterly transparent, pale yellow head, nice head of foam.
Aroma is bare, shy, emitting no flavors to speak of, bone-dry.
Taste:not bad, but not much. Very minimal. Extra-light body, tiniest texture, slick and nearly buttery, finishes on the dry side.
Nothing wrong with this lager, great "lawnmowin’" brew, just doesn’t offer anything I can use...though if there was nothing else available in some certain situation, I’d endure it.
11026 (1772) - Alabama, USA - SEP 13, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Tap. Poorer quality. Perhaps a bad tap line. Yellow and fizzy. Watery.
Lumpy (1802) - Carrollton, Texas, USA - AUG 20, 2004
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Stinks. Smells like rotten bananas. Tastes like a clean wit beer. Not bad but not impressive. Perfectly average.
Sickboy282 (1115) - San Diego, California, USA - AUG 2, 2004
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is the worst pilsner/blonde ale that I think I have ever had. I don’t mind their bock if there is nothing else to drink, but this one was undrinkable.
drewdogg (62) - USA - JUL 31, 2004
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
A solid American Pilsener that goes great with food. You shouldn’t and can’t expect much more from this beer.