aenimopiate (176) - The United States of Texas, Texas, USA - JUL 15, 2009
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
I had this beer years ago, but I still remember it well. I remember liking this one for its honey characteristics. It’s ok that it’s now retired, as almost every brand has its own honey beer at this point.
kidmartinek (3741) - austin, Texas, USA - JUN 14, 2009
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
had on of these saved from a long time ago. Pours a light golden color with a 2 inch head. Aroma is faint and consists of mostly sweet malt notes. Flavor is very sweet and only a little bitter. Taste more like flat flavored malt water than beer. Palate is spritzy. Finish is foamy.
milljam (682) - Norman, Oklahoma, USA - FEB 10, 2009
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Although I’m not a fan of wheat beers.....I liked the subtle honey flavor with this one. it wasn’t overpowering...and it added a nice sweetness to the beer. It ashame they don’t brew it anymore.
SphinxTX (2876) - Mata Gorda, Texas, USA - DEC 17, 2007
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Ok, I do not care for beer with honey flavor. This beer was decient quality, somewhat sweet. Color seemed yellow, goldish like. Had decient fruity notes. Im not a fan of this though.
kp (10884) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - SEP 1, 2007
1.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
hazy yellow, whispy white head, slightly sweet aroma, light malt flavor, hint of sweetness,
Aroma: 4/10; Appearance: 2/10; Flavor: 2/10; Palate: 2/10; Overall: 5/20
The score was calculated based upon the notes and an old scoring system.
SudsMcDuff (6837) - .....Manchester United.........., Texas, USA - NOV 16, 2006
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
I had this beer a couple of years ago and haven’t seen it at my local stores for a while, When I had it, Nice pale red, more of a brown color, some head, with not a lot of lacing, the taste was great....if it was stronger, a satisfying beer...
fly (1431) - austin, Tejas, Texas, USA - AUG 8, 2005
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Although perhaps not as bad as I make it out to be, not what I would consider to be a true (or at least well made) wheat beer in thge European sense. When you see HONEY in a name, be afraid. Okay, that’s a gross generalization, but so was this beer.
3fourths (8598) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - MAR 5, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
An old semi-regular drinker back in the early undegraduate days, it was fizzy and yellow with a decently-present fake honey and sugar flavor. Appealed more as a fruit beer with its sweetness.
KAggie97 (3529) - Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA - OCT 31, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Not a bad beer, but it needs more of something in it to make it better. Honey, maybe?!! False advertising, sure, but it’s not bad.
FtWorthBrew (105) - Fort Worth, Texas, USA - AUG 19, 2003
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Great thrist quenching beer, very light, hopefully spoetkl will cycle it back through the markets soon.