TheShark (18) - Georgia, USA - MAR 6, 2010
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A poor attempt at creating a Blue Moon competitor stateside. Too heavy on the orange taste, especially if garnished with a orange slice or chunk. I typically like Wits, but this one is just not for me.
basspro76 (423) - New York, USA - FEB 23, 2010
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Flavor is of fake oranges and sugar. Slight wheat flavor on the aftertaste, little to watery.
iggynelix (88) - Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 23, 2010
3.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Aroma is light, hints of orange and coriander. Unfiltered wheat ale, cloudy and pale lemon-coloured. Light sweet taste with virtually no bitterness, some wheat/grass-like qualities on the finish. Meduim body, slight more than most wheats, average carbonation with a light end note.
ExpendableHero (771) - Florida, USA - FEB 21, 2010
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottles and tap, a tasty alternative to a Blue Moon. They are quite similar, both smelling of citrus peels. Pours a rich orange/gold color with some lacing. Drop an orange slice in the glass. The difference between this and Blue Moon would have to be that this one has a stronger orange flavor to it.
Sammer (1079) - Plano, Texas, USA - FEB 21, 2010
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Yellow pour from 12 oz. bottle. Watery, citrus taste. Really is a disservice to Belgian Witbiers, as there is really nothing here to make you want to buy again. Do yourself a favor, spend just a little bit more for something better.
bockimstein (167) - New Madrid, Missouri, USA - FEB 15, 2010
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Mass market attempt at Belgian Wheat. Tap to a Shock Top bar glass, served with a hunk of orange that I promptly threw on the table. Pours yellow and cloudy with a white head that is short-lived. Grass, hay and citrus. Mild hop and wheat grain taste that is nondescript except for the light sour citrus. Body is somewhat thin cream. Nothing to write home about.
Overml01 (225) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - FEB 10, 2010
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle at home. Not bad, but... well, not good either.
Pretty much expected from AB Brewing... an alright beer that canít quite survive past the first trials of craft-beermanship. Share with some friends then forget and move forward. You probably wonít mind spending the money for it this time... but be ready to move forward quickly and leave this beer for the other new line of craft-beerians.
virtuosovii (103) - California, USA - FEB 6, 2010
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
This is kind of an embarrassing take on the Belgian white style. The citrus is kind of weak, flavor is cheap, sour and watery. InBev needs to stay out of this style. I mean donít they own Hoegaarden technically? How did they manage to fail so bad?
stormriderWI (11) - Siren, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 29, 2010
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
I have to start examining the lables when Iím trying to find a new beer. Had no idea this was a bud product. This is simply a boring shtty beer. Itís smell a little citirsy, a little head not much. Taste is bland and unsatisfying. Sucks.
mansquito (3973) - Nueva York, New York, USA - JAN 24, 2010
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pours a hazy orange/yellow, with no proper head action to speak of. Aroma is just a bunch of citrus and a modicum of wheat. Taste is pretty much the same... along with a crappy macro undertone (you guys know what I mean). Basically, the only reason I got this was because there was a deal at some Williamsburg bar for this beer... 3 bucks a pint. But I would prefer to never have it again.