RateBeer
overall
98
99
style
Serve in Shaker, Tulip

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 3213   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.76   SEASONAL: Winter   EST. CALORIES: 204   ABV: 6.8%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Sierra Nevada Celebration Ale represents a time honored tradition of brewing a special beer for the holiday season. There are generous portions of barley malts and fine whole hops of several varieties, creating a brew with a full, rich and hearty character.


3.6
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
thehoff (596) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - NOV 22, 2003
UPDATED: NOV 30, 2008 2003 Vintage: Rusty orange/red with a quarter inch and falling cream head. Smells quite hoppy. Definite grapefruit nose. Actually has a lighter flavor than the smell might lead you to believe. It does end in quite a nice bitterness. This is the entire characteristic of the beer though. I’m a little disappointed because I thought the beer would be a little more complex. Just another IPA. Rated 3.2 2008 Vintage: Nice amber hue, frothy cream colored head, about quarter inch. Again the grapefruit and bitterness in the nose, slight sweetness. Some floral notes as well. Very bitter. OK just not my favorite. Rated 3.6

4
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
raymow (811) - Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 21, 2003
Excellent reddish coloring and nice hoppy, slightly sweet flavor and aroma. I'll have another (and keep them coming).

3.8
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 16/20
jzzbassman (1511) - New Albany, Mississippi, USA - NOV 21, 2003
Less spicy than most holidays I've tried, it is never the less one of my favorite IPA's that I wish I sould have year round. Had it tonight with leftover Thai Chicken Panang, and it was super.

4.1
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
LordHedgehog (144) - Westminster, Maryland, USA - NOV 21, 2003
2003 bottle. Nice and hoppy, well spiced, and well-developed. High-quality Christmas ale with good, but not heavy, spices.

3.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 17/20
zborgerd (187) - Illinois, USA - NOV 21, 2003
Take their pale ale, mix it with a little bit of their Bigfoot ale, hop it up a bit, and dump a bit of spices in there for some flavor. This is a pretty red ale with a nice and thick head. Not as bitter as Bigfoot. Not as smooth as the pale ale. But it's not astringent in the least dispite its extra alcohol. Slightly spiced for an added flavor burst. This is a fine beer from the maker of one of my favorite daily drinkers (the pale ale). The floral cascade hop smell is trademark of Sierra Nevada. Very high quality with the best natural ingredients. You can really taste it in the beer... And don't forget to turn the bottle ever so slightly to get that fabulous bottle-contitioning yeast to mix around quite well. Cheers.

4
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 17/20
flemdawg (531) - Naples, Florida, USA - NOV 20, 2003
2003 bottle. Beautiful red color with a white head on top. Reminded me of a candy cane, sort of. Aroma was hoppy and spicey, but I could not tell which spices. The taste was great. Hops, bitter, and a host of others. Finshed rather crisp and bubbly. One bottle is heading down to the basment for future reference.

3.7
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
Aesir (130) - Tustin, California, USA - NOV 20, 2003
2002 - Nose is as flowery as a $2 hooker, it is as hoppy as a $2 hooker and about as bitter as a $2 hooker. If I was going to drink a $2 hooker, you can bet your backside I'd be gusslin' one o' these!!!!!!!111

4.9
   AROMA 10/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 20/20
dwyerpg (4528) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - NOV 19, 2003
To date, this is my favorite beer. It tastes just like Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, cept more hoppy and stronger. yes.

3.7
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
DrGonzo (625) - Somerville, Massachusetts, USA - NOV 18, 2003
Bottle, 2003 edition. Nice copper/ruby color, medium white lacing. Has that instantly recognizable Sierra Nevada aroma, pine and citrus hops, probably tree bark from the high Sierras in there too, plus something like clothes dryer sheets. Hmmm. Flavor ranges from quite bitter, to a nice sweet malty bread aftertaste, to more of a harsh bitter finish. Feels oily as well. Hops to the max here. I was expecting more, though I don't notes I think I remember last year's being a bit better. I'll store some of these for a few months and check back. Think I was expecting more.

3.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
cquiroga (371) - Tujunga, California, USA - NOV 17, 2003
UPDATED: JAN 4, 2004 11/15/03. Poured out of 12 oz. bottle, bought at Liquorama in Upland, CA 11/7/03. 2002 vintage. Hazy flat amber color with fluffy cream tan colored head that lingers. Lacing is pretty weak. Nose is mellow, light hops and malt with syrupy honey sweetness and almost doughy. Taste is initially reminiscent of a sweetened honey milk tea, spices and very pleasant maturing malt character. Then the finish comes along. . . bitterly hoppy and almost numbingly dry, very slightly sweet and still doughy with a hint of sourdough. Medium-full mouthfeel and smooth texture with very dry body. Quite a long finish, a little bit sticky to the palate. Quite a good beer. Better than the '03 I had, but I don't know if it's the maturation or the recipe. 7/3/9/3/16/3.8 11/5/03. On draft at Stuffed Sandwich in San Gabriel, CA 11/5/03. 2003 vintage. Very pale nose. Slightly hazy, medium amber color. Cream-colored head that fluffs and then falls flat. Decent ash lacing that fades quickly. Nice, medium-full mouthfeel and creamy texture, but not much going on in the flavor. A little sweet, a little hops, a little ash. Strong bitter finish that is a little too forward and harsh compared to the rest of it. A bit dirty and punishing, not very well balanced, but still decent. No more, no less. A definite disappointment compared to the reputation, and also compared to the '02 I tried later. 5/3/6/2/12/2.8 Final rating above reflects averages of these two ratings.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 282 283 284  285  286 287 288 » 322


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50