johnadam2002 (529), Hainesport, New Jersey, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | May 8, 2007 Very confusing brew. With every sip it seemed like it jumped from malt to hop. Not really balanced. Had better... way better. drismyhero (815), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | May 6, 2007 The malts are present, but not forefront. The Magnum and Golding hops take backseat to Cascade any day and the dry-hoppong isn’t evident. Loses flavor in the finish. A very mainstream IPA without the drinkability of the Pale. It’s definitely a decent all-around IPA, it’s just not a thirst quencher like it’s famous counterpart, and not as big and flavorful as a good Western IPA should be. johninmelb (692), Bristol, Gloucestershire, England
| 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 | May 6, 2007 Hoppy, sharp nose with citrus and grapefruit. Flavour is dry, hoppy, gently balanced with some toffee-malt, and amazingly moreish. Sierra Nevada don’t make bad beers, and this is another good ’un. An absolutely perfect example of the style. M0RHI (1067), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | May 4, 2007 Bottle. Slightly cloudy chestnut colour with ah thin off-white head. Nose smells like hops, mixed with some off-cheese. Not great, not clean. Mouth is quite malty with alcohol immediately, some grassy bitter tones, ugh, next it tastes like baby oil and talcum powder. Then some hops, with a bit of a flimsy bitter attack. The baby oil and oiliness returns and carries to the palate. Shalln’t have this again. bager (2121), Copenhagen N, Denmark
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | May 4, 2007 Bottled. Dark golden coloured with a medium sized off-white head. Somewhat malty with notes of flowers, pines,fruit and hops. Nice tartness although it has a little bite in the after taste. STEPHENDR (478), California, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | May 4, 2007 12 oz. bottle- color of reddish brown , with a small stark white head - nose of grapefruit , malts , some BO , and mild hops – taste of dirty hops , mild grapefruit , red fruit??, and malts - body is dry , and with medium high carbonation – aftertaste of hops , resin , dry , and slight malts mistersinalin (367), St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 | May 4, 2007 Updated: May 7, 2007I found myself alone with a six pack of this on a Thursday night. And without the proper supervision, I drank them all. They were more enjoyable as I went on. Now is that a negative? Maybe not. Maybe the initial tasting rates the beer as shown in the score. But, it is very drinkable, and its flavor improved. And that helps define this as a session beer I would buy again and again. Or maybe it was just beer goggled taste buds. Nalu (32), Washington, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | May 2, 2007 Orangey gold with a light tan head which quickly fades to a moderate lace. Nose is hops and faint sweetness, quickly given over to dry hoppiness with a bread overlay. Hops last to a dry, abrupt finish and then to a pine resin aftertaste which isn’t unpleasant. Not a session beer as is their Pale Ale, but a nice change of pace for SN fans.
|