carboloader (674) - Houston, Texas, USA - AUG 23, 2003
3.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: JUL 15, 2008 I’ve had on draft and from bottle. Both are excellent, but draft is rated here. Amber/copper, clear, huge tan head, nice lacing. Aroma of hops, pear, berry (?). Nice, sweet malt initially, then long, bitter finish. Definitely a stand-by at bars that carry it. Excellent cascade hoppy flavor (which I love). Finish is pretty bitter at first, but grew on me. One of my favorites.
Falconseye8 (542) - Evans, Colorado, USA - AUG 19, 2003
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Very nice smooth with a little bitter kick. This is very good but I like Boulevard Pale Ale a little bit more. Not as citrusy as I expected. Very Nice very drinkable and I would recommend it to anyone who hadn't tried it.
beerbus (20) - Fishers, Indiana, USA - AUG 17, 2003
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
I love the complex bouquet when pouring a glass. Hard to believe something this good is sold at the local drug store!
Ubiquibeer (140) - Cleveland, USA - AUG 16, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
This is the rosetta stone of beer, used to translate macro drinkers to real beer. It had been a while since I had one of these, and I think the quality has gone down just a touch. Still a great 'macro-micro'.
dmcguriman (10) - USA - AUG 15, 2003
4.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
My favorite "available everywhere in the US" beer. I just had a keg of it for a recent party and it was a huge hit amongst even the BUD drinkers!
Flipbrewer (33) - San Francisco, California, USA - AUG 15, 2003
4.5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
Classic West Coast pale ale. Signature Cascade hop aroma and flavor: citrusy-spicy bouquet with a grapefruit like character start to finish. Fine acidity with a nicely balanced maltiness (not to sweet, not too dry). Fine hop bitterness emerges mid-palate and follows all the way to the finish and aftertaste. Estery (fruity) flavors also emerge mid-palate that transforms into a yeasty-bready character in the aftertaste. A wonderfully complex and satisfying pale ale.
beerluvindave (194) - Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 11, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Very hoppy with a bitterness that is marginally fresh. Good overall body and flavor otherwise.
dberger624 (1028) - Phila, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 10, 2003
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Draft at Tuckers Pub in Wildwood, NJ. This is the beer that started it for me. Nice cascase hop bite with just the right amount of bitterness to it.
SilkTork (5236) - Rochester, Kent, United Kingdom, Kent, ENGLAND - AUG 7, 2003
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
UPDATED: DEC 15, 2004 Aug, 2003: I am really pleased to get this - from what I understand this is the original American Pale Ale, a style which is making something of an impression over here in the UK, itís path having been laid by the popularity of the Golden Summer Ales which have a similar hop profile, though are softer and cleaner in the palate. The aroma is quite heavenly - delicate, floral and spicily citric, though that does die down after a while into something more grassy and rain like, even a touch metallic. When worked slightly the pale malt aroma does rise, but doesnít last long against the hops. The taste is surprisingly clean up front, but the sweet malt soon makes an appearance, slightly sticky but with a rounded body - a satisfying base from which the citric hops do their work, gradually taking over from the sweetness to emerge dark and tangy in the finish. A very pleasant beer. [3.6]
Sept, 2004: <a href=Beer-Ratings.asp?BeerID=290&FanOfID=4383>T Big Face Off. This came off very badly on the day. Even though bottle conditioned there was a noticable cardboard aroma and flavour. It simply didnít taste fresh. It came over as simplistic when compared to the other beers; lacking an interesting flavour profile and with a poor mouthfeel. I scored it 2.2. Having it again now, a few days later, and just drinking it rather than comparing it to other beers, or examining it critically, I find itís a very pleasant and enjoyable beer - though the cardboard quality is still there. [2.9]
Dec, 2004: Head to Head with <a href= Beer-Ratings.asp?BeerID=7658&FanOfID=4383> Little Creatures. Initially the beers seem identical. But gradually it becomes apparant that the Aussie beer tastes fresher, crisper, cleaner, fruitier... A quick look at the dates shows that the Sierra Nevada expires in 6 months time, while the Aussie one expires in 11 months time. Freshness is everything with this beer style. [3.2]
jerkadilly74 (155) - mooresville, Indiana, USA - AUG 6, 2003
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Tasty. The taste of fresh hops dominates this brew. Well balanced, just the right amount of carbonation. Smooth and easy to drink. Best of all these are easy to find and the cost isn't too outrageous.