Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - AUG 3, 2002
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: JAN 6, 2004 On tap: This is the first time that I've had Sierra Nevada Pale Ale on tap since I've joined RateBeer. In the bar I wrote down my ratings and now that I'm looking at my first rating, I see that all the numbers are unchanged. Nice! First rating: Sierra Nevada Pale Ale is great. The best hoppy pale ale for the money. I wish more beers were bottle conditioned.
djbuddha (90) - Many, Louisiana, USA - AUG 3, 2002
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
I had it on tap, but thought it was a very good looking, tasteful beer. Iíll definately be drinking it again.
Inveigler (371) - Ferndale, Michigan, USA - AUG 1, 2002
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Like a constant companion, Sierra Nevada Pale Ale is always there for me. Easy to find in grocery stores and in many restaurants, this beer has become one of my favorite pales. Deep reddish color and a little maltier than most pale ales. Fantastic hops character balances out the malt. This is a hopped beer for all seasons and occasions. I would drink it in a boat, I would drink it in a moat ...
TheBeerCollector (633) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - JUL 28, 2002
4.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
UPDATED: FEB 7, 2004 I gave this one another try and was quite impressed. Good hoppiness but not overbearing. Refreshing and easy to drink. This is my favorite session ale.
jpknight22 (171) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JUL 28, 2002
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Hmmm, maybe the keg was getting kinda skunky, but I tried this beer on tap one time and was not impressed. Sierra Nevada Pale Ale has a long ways to go before it reaches a the quality of an ale such as Newcastle. The initial taste reminded me a lot of battery acid, and suprisingly enough, so did the finish. I simply did not like this beer.
Gunshy (479) - Ohio, USA - JUL 27, 2002
3.5 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
This beer poured a golden amber color and formed a small white head that didnít hold and left little lace. Some carbonation present. If had an aroma of hops with a slight bit of citrus. The flavor was of hops with some malt. A bit of citrus aspect. The finish was slightly sweet/citrus with a bit of a bite. A good beer, but I find the local pale ales on tap to be better as well as some others I had.
007lund (92) - Ann Arbor, USA - JUL 27, 2002
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
A good pale ale, if you donít mind the malt overpowering the beer. Tastes very floral, almost too much.
Aurelius (3844) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JUL 26, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Mild, but menacing, hops on top a dream-cicle (orange and vanilla) aroma. Dominant dry-hop flavor, with some vanilla. Pale orange. Keep this on the front of the tongue, because the bitter really builds if you let it get onto the sides and back of the tongue. I know that people like this, but itís a ham-handed ode to Cascades hops -- thatís done much better by Anchor.
Racegoer (351) - Indiana, Indiana, USA - JUL 26, 2002
4.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
My go to Beer for Summer . get it by the six or by the 1/2 case, just get some. I am starting to see this beer widely available and I am glad. Much better than other choices at most resturants,even my local grocery has it. This is a good choice to give to those who have been indoctrinated thru marketing that a Bud or Coors light is a good beer.I will keep my beer fridge full of this stuff, canít wait to get my first 1/2 barrel keg of it.
Vryce99 (2) - Redford, Michigan, USA - JUL 25, 2002 does not count
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Iím not much of an ale drinker, but I did enjoy this pale ale. Very nice flavor.