eaglefan538 (3019) - Wilmington, Delaware, USA - JUN 3, 2006
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
The flavor on this was surprisingly better than I was expecting. The hop presence was the most enjoyable, as this lager’s malt base was well complemented by it. Pour was usual, color was usual (for a basic lager). May come back to this one, the Tiger lager, and the San Miguel, as they’ve all been pretty decent light summer beers.
stison42 (318) - Blacksburg, Virginia, USA - JUN 2, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: JAN 22, 2007 Very light gold. Clear. Quick burst of flavor. Smooth with no aftertaste. The taste stays on the front of the tongue.
eboats (1082) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - JUN 2, 2006
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Poured lighter than piss with a white head. Aroma is rubber not fresh not burnt just used rubber. Flavor is slightly sweet BMC macro swill rice crap.
fuzznuts1 (6) - Texas, USA - MAY 30, 2006 does not count
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Poured thin and golden from the bottle with a moderate white head. Smelled faintly of hops and fruit. Tasted like generic lager beer. Did what it was supposed to do as I ate my yummy Thai dinner
puzzl (3258) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 29, 2006
1.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pours ugly yellow in its own ugly tumbler. Looks like a glass I’d drink my juice out of. Flavor is sickly fruity, in a bad way. There is a lot more flavor in this than normal PLs but the flavor is off and crappy and not worth it. I’d rather just have something tasteless that I could quaff (if that’s what I were going for).
voota (765) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAY 29, 2006
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Not a bad looking beer, nice big fluffy white head. Good stong malty armoa, without too much skunky hops. Good stong body, bitterness is stong but a little harsh. Probably not enough caramel in the body for my liking but as far as premium lagers go, this is the goods
Quinten (1060) - zaandam, NETHERLANDS - MAY 27, 2006
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Golden color, thin head, good ingredients (3) no way bad to be on holliday in thailand
Hooker (467) - Coquitlam, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 25, 2006
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Can from Thailand. Clear gold colour with thick stark white head. Mild bread and biscuit nose. Mild malt taste with light lingering bitter finish. Fairly full bodied for a lager.
ehhdayton (1188) - USA - MAY 25, 2006
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
A light hop aroma is noticed. The color is a light clear golden with a rapidly diminishing white head. Initially the beer had a slight malty sweetness. As the beer was drunk the hops came through more clearly. The finish on the palate was mild and uninspiring.
sanmiguel (118) - Illinois, USA - MAY 23, 2006
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Bottled. Pours a large, yet rapid disappearing head. Strong malty taste. Singha reminded me of the time I tried Red Stripe: it had a rubbing alcohol taste to it. Bitter, astringent aftertaste. Surprisingly good and high alcohol content too! One final note, Singha or "singa" in Filipino means snot!