TheGreatKen (76) - San Diego, California, USA - DEC 26, 2003
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
The flavor is worse than Heineken, and it has a bad aftertaste. If you could accept the aftertaste, it is chugable.
omhper (20567) - Tyresö, SWEDEN - DEC 22, 2003
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: MAY 10, 2006 Bottled. Pale golden with brief head. Fruity, grassy and sweet. Raw and unrefined, but at least with solid body.
bob32256 (171) - Jacksonville, Florida, USA - DEC 20, 2003
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
distinct smell of hops; pale yellow with a thin white head; surprisingly good taste with just the right amount of bitterness
SDbruboy (1864) - San Diego, California, USA - DEC 13, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle from Beers of the World package. Poured golden and clear with a large white head that diminished quickly but left nice lacing. Assertive aroma of maltiness and bracing hops. Full flavored lager but a little too abrasive in the hops and leaves a tart metallic aftertaste. Light body and decent carbonation. What the heck, it's worth another country in my stats...
GEOBRAU (188) - Mesa, Arizona, USA - DEC 6, 2003
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle: no telling how old this beer was. i got it in a beers of the world sampler. Stale pilsner with nothing of note.
Jeppe (2631) - Brooklyn, Alabama, USA - DEC 4, 2003
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: DEC 25, 2003 I drank 4-6 of these every day for a month when I went to Thailand this summer. And thought it was good! Now I have tried one in Denmark (way different climate...) and I can promise you that this beer must be consumed under the sun in Thailand and not in the cold and wet Denmark.
A descent lager, the best I got in Thailand (compared to Chang and Leo). Light with a little flavour and almost no aroma!
imdownthepub (11126) - Banbury, Oxfordshire, ENGLAND - NOV 30, 2003
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottled, Pasteurised. There is actually some character to this beer. A spicey malt with even traces of hops and some bitterness. A very reasonable pilsner.
beastdog75 (363) - Brick, New Jersey, USA - NOV 24, 2003
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
A very unpleasant beer, more reminicent of a malt-liquor. Putrid skunky smell, has quite a strong alcoholic flavor, quite bitter. Strange chemical taste to it. Not good any way you look at it.
eraserhd10 (226) - new haven, Connecticut, USA - NOV 18, 2003
3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
This pale, gold colored lager pours with a brief, creamy head and with an aroma that opens up like fresh-baked bread. I wanted to like this beer so much more than I actually did. The taste was below average pilsner-ish, a little flat and even a little skunky, like canteen water. There was a bitterness and presence of hops but quantity doesn't always mean quality. It does, I suppose, pair well with spicy Thai or Maylaysian foods which saves a little face, but I just wish this was a better beer!
archstanton (105) - mukilteo, Washington, USA - NOV 14, 2003
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
oh my god this is worse than steel reserve 211 stay far far away from this malted crap.YUCK