hopscotch (10265) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - FEB 14, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Crystal clear, pale yellow lager.
Corn and straw in the nose and flavor. Well-balanced, but certainly not all that strong "hop-wise." Light-bodied with a fizzy mouthfeel. Short, dry finish.
Nate (3824) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 14, 2004
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pungent hops aroma, light bitter, slightly metallic. Beany character, with little malt contribution to the aroma. Standard lager-type smell. Pale yellow clear with small white head that dissipates quickly with little lacing. Medium-light watery body with heavy carbonation. A little bit of sweetness up front, not malty. Hops come in, but are not fruity or floral. Impart a pungent and dry bitterness to the finish, that lasts well after the beer is swallowed. This beer would be a nice with food, but by itself it's not very good.
raymow (1167) - Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 11, 2004
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Not bad. All of these foreign lager types from India, Thailand, etc. seem to taste more or less the same. (As do most of the American lagers, now that I think of it). Overall, it's drinkable - just different. Extremely pale yellow color, beery aroma, and malty, slightly hoppy flavor with a slightly dry finish.
Winefly (60) - KEW, AUSTRALIA - FEB 10, 2004
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Nice golden colour with a pretty damn good taste as well. Quite balanced with the hops and aromas was ok. Good solid beer.
bitter (1136) - Henderson, Nevada, USA - FEB 10, 2004
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
bottled: had this one with some spicy thai food. cuts the heat down well. golden pale yellow hue. with white head. malty overtones that cuts down the hop flavor. a descent asian style pilsener, probably some rice adjuncts thrown in the mixxxx!!
oli (108) - DENMARK - FEB 4, 2004
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
I was pleasantly surprised with the taste.Could tastes the hops which lingered in the mouth.Otherwise it looked week and watery.Still,i wouldn´t mind drinking this in a hot climate.
NickS (4) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 22, 2004 does not count
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
the jerk at the liquor store suggested it, so i took his advice, really it isnt terrible, but its not much better than a bud light, worst thing about it was the price
bruno1378 (126) - Epping, New Hampshire, USA - JAN 20, 2004
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
wow this smells like when I take a tour of the local Bud factory. I saw a few deScriptions that rated this as a bad version of Heineken...and I'd have to agree. This is certainly nothing impressive and definitely not worth the money, and not something I'll drink again (unless perhaps it was free).
heemer77 (5211) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - JAN 19, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: JAN 6, 2006 Nothing different from a typical macro. They always seem to have this in Thai places. the aroma is sweet with carrots and some grass. A little sweet and some grassy notes. There are carrots and some green bell peppers.
MadMan (495) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - JAN 19, 2004
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
This is not very impressive. It has very much malt liquor characteristics, kind of like a Old English 800 and not at all like a barley malt beer. Hops were there, but not enough. This is a pathetic beer, and no excuse for a pils. I would drink it only if no other beers were available.