harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - MAY 19, 2006
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is pointless, I mean seriously. A bit of noxious aroma when opened, with no body and no flavor. WTF?
MadIndian (2720) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 27, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Jesus...God.... I think this might be the worse beer of all time. No Joke.
Needed the rating.
cards04 (2628) - Steinbach, Manitoba, CANADA - DEC 27, 2011
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
If you donít like beer, youíll probably like Sleemanís Clear, as there is very little flavor to be found here. Clean, and Crisp indeed.
robertsreality (2460) - Minnesota, USA - DEC 31, 2004
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Now, if Youíre Going to Drink Sleeman, This is the Easiest To Drink, As it is Mostly Void of the Bitter Sweet "All-Natural" Flavors They Use.
DeanF (2342) - Alberta, CANADA - DEC 14, 2010
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Being a masochist of sorts Iím always fascinated by the "light" beer craze of North America. I never found a "light" beer in Europe, as people were happy to know that their beer tasted like beer. Except in the case of Kriek, but then it tasted like Kriek, and not water. Speaking of which, why havenít the big commercial brewers tried to market a Kriek-style brew to the same people who might buy a "light" beer? Nonetheless, in my further education of all things related to beer being "light", whatever that may mean at any given time, this stuff pours with a very pale and clear body but still a small layer of head. Faint aroma of murky hops, which was more than I was expecting. Taste is a smooth nothingness with just a vague hint of malt if you tilt your head correctly at the right time. Dry finish, at least. Iím still looking for that "light" beer thatís worth drinking instead of a fine soda water.
VertBaconStrips (2302) - Asshat, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 11, 2009
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
This smellless, colourless, flavourless mess is a joke of a brew. Itís clear of all worth and itís very clear that Sleemans is consistent at putting out waste of money beers. Iíve had my share of low % beers but this must be the worst of all of them.
piscator34 (2300) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - JAN 28, 2004
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: FEB 11, 2004 You might as well drink tap-water. At least it's free and there are ZERO carbs in water. This beer looks fine (for a light beer), and smells ok, but doesn't taste like much. What little flavor there is somewhat like wet cardboard.
matt7215 (2278) - Cambridge, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 27, 2008
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
341 ml bottle from the LCBO breakers bin. pours very pale yellow. no aroma. slightest hint of malt flavour. goes down like water. very very light. almost not even worth having.
mds (2250) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 22, 2004
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Can. brutal! I canít understand why anyone would drink this beer. Itís all CORN, aroma and flavour. itís really carbonated, it tastes almost like club soda or something to that effect. ugh...
Dorqui (2174) - Brescia, ITALY - NOV 22, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Inconsistent, it deprives of character and scents.