shintriad (700) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 2, 2003
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
As you would expect, this is beer-flavoured water. That's the downside. The upside is, anywhere you'll find this beer, you're also likely to find a whole bunch of OTHER brands of beer-flavoured water, and at least this is low-calorie. Since most people tend to drink in excess after 8 p.m., you probably should be drinking this kinda crap if you're concerned about weight. Otherwise pop some carb blockers. Unfortunately, real beer is generally packed with what's essentially sugar.
Bainer (45) - Windsor, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 31, 2003
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Like everyone said- watery. Little or no head, little or no carbonation- tasted and looked like a beer left for a few days. Not worth the low-cal trade off. Skip this one.
piscator34 (1946) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - JAN 28, 2004
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: FEB 11, 2004 You might as well drink tap-water. At least it's free and there are ZERO carbs in water. This beer looks fine (for a light beer), and smells ok, but doesn't taste like much. What little flavor there is somewhat like wet cardboard.
presario (4580) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - MAY 7, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Gold innocent looking beverage with minimal head. Aroma is faint, slightly off but not offensive. First sip is really harsh as is the finish. It is not "remarkably clean". After that first shock the beer most resembles soda water.
Commodore (112) - Ontario, CANADA - AUG 31, 2004
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Yeah...club soda covers it quite nicely. I couldn’t even taste anything because it was way too fizzy in my mouth. I don’t know enough to tell what adjuncts are used (corn, rice, etc) but this was not at all worth it. At least Sterling has some taste to it.
swiseman (424) - Fredericton, New Brunswick, CANADA - SEP 26, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
might be good for spiking punch, but not much else. tastes more like Perrier than beer. If you have to go low-carbohydrate that bad, then you may as well skip beer altogether.
Dorqui (2081) - Brescia, ITALY - NOV 22, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Inconsistent, it deprives of character and scents.
GoldenSpunky (120) - Rochester, New York, USA - FEB 10, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle of some random year. Every year seems to bad when this "beer" is bottled. The appearance is amazing with a pale yellow that seems to fade as it warms. Pours kinds like giner ale but with no flavor or aroma at all. Cant finish this beer but definitly didnt expect to. But hey look at how many carbs I just cut!..WOW AMAZING 100th beer! Heres to you boys!
JRHBrew (366) - Fredericton, New Brunswick, CANADA - FEB 5, 2006
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
It is incredibly bland. Not much of a beer. For some bizarre reason, I actually kinda like this one.
yarry (527) - Waterdown, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 20, 2006
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
341ml Bottle 4% a/v
The smell is of.. a friggin wet dog or something like that. Looks ok, nothing special. The taste is nothing special but not as bad as has been stated by the previous guys. Definetly crappy but not undrinkable.
All it was good for is raising my rated beers count by one.. Dont pay for it.